Kraus et al v. Lennar Reno, LLC et al

Filing 27

ORDER granting ECF No. 26 Stipulation to Remand. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/13/2018. (Certified copy of this order and Pacer Docket Sheet mailed to Second Judicial District Court on 12/13/2018). (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 Gregory H. King Nevada Bar No. 7777 2 ghk@paynefears.com Sarah J. Odia 3 Nevada Bar No. 11053 sjo@paynefears.com 4 PAYNE & FEARS LLP 6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 220 5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 Telephone: (702) 851-0300 6 Facsimile: (702) 851-0315 7 Attorneys for Defendants LENNAR RENO, LLC and LENNAR RENO, LLC dba LENNAR HOMES 8 (702) 851-0300 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 6385 S. RAINBOW BLVD., SUITE 220 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89118 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 PAYNE & FEARS LLP 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 WILLIAM G. and MARISSA J. KRAUS; MATTHEW AND LEAH COWEN; RALPH 12 & FRANCES CASTELLI, as Co-Trustees under THE CASTELLI FAMILY TRUST; 13 RICHARD & DEBRA MENCHEL; RICHARD & MARY D. NUNES as Trustees 14 of the NUNES LIVING TRUST; THOMAS I. & HEIDI A. SHELTON; RICHARD M. 15 LUND AND NANCY S. LUND, Trustees of the LUND FAMILY TRUST, DATED 16 MARCH IS, 2002; NICK TRAN AND CHI PHAM; MICHAEL L. VERA; ATAM P. 17 AND MARGO G. LALCHANDANI, as CoTrustees under THE LALCHANDANI 18 FAMILY TRUST AGREEMENT DATED JULY 24, 1992; CHARLES E. & CAROL J. 19 FAGEN as Trustees of the FAGEN LIVING TRUST; OWEN C. KOCHINSKI, 20 individually, as husband and wife, and trustees 21 Plaintiffs, 22 v. 23 LENNAR RENO, LLC and LENNAR RENO, 24 LLC dba LENNAR HOMES, 25 CASE NO.: 3:18-cv-00120-MMD-WGC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMAND ACTION Defendants. 26 27 28 . STIPULATION REGARDING ARBITRATION PROTOCOL 1 Plaintiffs and Defendants Lennar Reno, LLC and Lennar Reno, LLC dba Lennar Homes 2 (“Lennar”) (Plaintiffs and Lennar collectively referred to herein as, “Parties”), by and through 3 their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 4 5 RECITALS A. Plaintiffs or their predecessors in interest, entered into purchase and sale 6 agreements (“PSAs”) with Lennar to purchase certain residences located in the Casa Bella at 7 Damonte Ranch development in Reno, Nevada that are the subject of this action (“Subject 8 Properties”). 9 B. Lennar alleges that the PSAs set forth certain dispute-resolution procedures and 11 binding arbitration. 12 C. On or around November 1, 2016, Plaintiffs began forwarding notices of 13 constructional defects to Lennar regarding the Subject Properties. On February 8, 2018, Plaintiffs (702) 851-0300 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 6385 S. RAINBOW BLVD., SUITE 220 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89118 PAYNE & FEARS LLP 10 requirements, including a requirement for claims regarding the Subject Properties to proceed to 14 filed a complaint against Lennar entitled Kraus, et al., v. Lennar Reno LLC, et al., Washoe 15 County, case no.: CV18-0027. 16 D. Lennar removed the Kraus, et al., v. Lennar Reno LLC, et al. action to the U.S. 17 District Court in and for the District of Nevada, on March 15, 2018, and it was assigned case 18 number 3:18-cv-00120-MMD-WGC (the “Litigation”). Plaintiffs thereafter filed a motion to 19 remand the Litigation to state court on April 10, 2018. (ECF No. 7). Lennar opposed Plaintiffs’ 20 motion to remand on April 24, 2018. (ECF No. 10). The Court denied the Motion. (ECF No. 23) 21 E. On multiple occasions, Lennar demanded that the Plaintiffs arbitrate their claims 22 regarding the Subject Properties. 23 F. After extensive meeting and conferring, the Parties agree to arbitrate the 24 Claimants’ claims regarding the Subject Properties. 25 G. The parties further agree to remand the action back to the Second Judicial District 26 Court, Washoe County, Nevada, so that the state court will retain jurisdiction over the action 27 pending arbitration. 28 -2STIPULATION REGARDING ARBITRATION PROTOCOL . 1 AGREEMENT 2 WHEREFORE, The Parties hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE to the following: 3 1. The above-captioned action shall be remanded to the Second Judicial District 4 Court, Washoe County, Nevada. The state court shall retain jurisdiction over the action pending 5 arbitration. 6 2. The Parties further stipulate that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and 7 costs with respect to the removal and subsequent remand of this action pursuant to this stipulation 8 9 and order but such agreement shall have no effect and shall not be considered by any Court and/or arbitrator in deciding whether to award attorneys’ fees and costs to either Party in pursuit and/or in 11 12 13 (702) 851-0300 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 6385 S. RAINBOW BLVD., SUITE 220 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89118 PAYNE & FEARS LLP 10 the conclusion of this Litigation as allowed under Nevada law.  IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: December 13, 2018 PAYNE & FEARS LLP 14 15 By: 16 17 Attorneys for Defendants LENNAR RENO, LLC and LENNAR RENO, LLC dba LENNAR HOMES 18 19 20 /s/ Sarah J. Odia GREGORY H. KING, NV Bar No. 7777 SARAH J. ODIA, NV Bar No. 11053 DATED: December 13, 2018 MADDOX, SEGERBLOM and CANEPA, LLP 21 22 By: 24 /s/ Ardea G. Canepa-Rotoli EVA G. SEGERBLOM, NV Bar No. 10749 ARDEA G. CANEPA-ROTOLI, NV Bar No. 12345 25 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 23 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION REGARDING ARBITRATION PROTOCOL . 1 2 ORDER The Court having reviewed the Parties Stipulation to Remand the above-captioned action 3 and good cause appearing, hereby ORDERS as follows: 4 1. The Parties’ Stipulation is approved; and 5 2. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada Case No.: 3:18-cv-00120-MMD- 6 WGC captioned, William G. and Melissa J. Kraus, et al. v. Lennar Reno, LLC, et al., 7 is hereby remanded to the Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County, Nevada. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 11 12 ____________________________________ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 4850-0550-1314.1 13 (702) 851-0300 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 6385 S. RAINBOW BLVD., SUITE 220 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89118 PAYNE & FEARS LLP December 13, 2018 10 Dated:__________________ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION REGARDING ARBITRATION PROTOCOL .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?