Kraus et al v. Lennar Reno, LLC et al
Filing
27
ORDER granting ECF No. 26 Stipulation to Remand. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/13/2018. (Certified copy of this order and Pacer Docket Sheet mailed to Second Judicial District Court on 12/13/2018). (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1 Gregory H. King
Nevada Bar No. 7777
2 ghk@paynefears.com
Sarah J. Odia
3 Nevada Bar No. 11053
sjo@paynefears.com
4 PAYNE & FEARS LLP
6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 220
5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Telephone: (702) 851-0300
6 Facsimile: (702) 851-0315
7 Attorneys for Defendants
LENNAR RENO, LLC and LENNAR RENO, LLC dba LENNAR HOMES
8
(702) 851-0300
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
6385 S. RAINBOW BLVD., SUITE 220
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89118
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
PAYNE & FEARS LLP
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11 WILLIAM G. and MARISSA J. KRAUS;
MATTHEW AND LEAH COWEN; RALPH
12 & FRANCES CASTELLI, as Co-Trustees
under THE CASTELLI FAMILY TRUST;
13 RICHARD & DEBRA MENCHEL;
RICHARD & MARY D. NUNES as Trustees
14 of the NUNES LIVING TRUST; THOMAS
I. & HEIDI A. SHELTON; RICHARD M.
15 LUND AND NANCY S. LUND, Trustees of
the LUND FAMILY TRUST, DATED
16 MARCH IS, 2002; NICK TRAN AND CHI
PHAM; MICHAEL L. VERA; ATAM P.
17 AND MARGO G. LALCHANDANI, as CoTrustees under THE LALCHANDANI
18 FAMILY TRUST AGREEMENT DATED
JULY 24, 1992; CHARLES E. & CAROL J.
19 FAGEN as Trustees of the FAGEN LIVING
TRUST; OWEN C. KOCHINSKI,
20 individually, as husband and wife, and
trustees
21
Plaintiffs,
22
v.
23
LENNAR RENO, LLC and LENNAR RENO,
24 LLC dba LENNAR HOMES,
25
CASE NO.: 3:18-cv-00120-MMD-WGC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO REMAND ACTION
Defendants.
26
27
28
.
STIPULATION REGARDING ARBITRATION PROTOCOL
1
Plaintiffs and Defendants Lennar Reno, LLC and Lennar Reno, LLC dba Lennar Homes
2 (“Lennar”) (Plaintiffs and Lennar collectively referred to herein as, “Parties”), by and through
3 their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
4
5
RECITALS
A.
Plaintiffs or their predecessors in interest, entered into purchase and sale
6 agreements (“PSAs”) with Lennar to purchase certain residences located in the Casa Bella at
7 Damonte Ranch development in Reno, Nevada that are the subject of this action (“Subject
8 Properties”).
9
B.
Lennar alleges that the PSAs set forth certain dispute-resolution procedures and
11 binding arbitration.
12
C.
On or around November 1, 2016, Plaintiffs began forwarding notices of
13 constructional defects to Lennar regarding the Subject Properties. On February 8, 2018, Plaintiffs
(702) 851-0300
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
6385 S. RAINBOW BLVD., SUITE 220
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89118
PAYNE & FEARS LLP
10 requirements, including a requirement for claims regarding the Subject Properties to proceed to
14 filed a complaint against Lennar entitled Kraus, et al., v. Lennar Reno LLC, et al., Washoe
15 County, case no.: CV18-0027.
16
D.
Lennar removed the Kraus, et al., v. Lennar Reno LLC, et al. action to the U.S.
17 District Court in and for the District of Nevada, on March 15, 2018, and it was assigned case
18 number 3:18-cv-00120-MMD-WGC (the “Litigation”). Plaintiffs thereafter filed a motion to
19 remand the Litigation to state court on April 10, 2018. (ECF No. 7). Lennar opposed Plaintiffs’
20 motion to remand on April 24, 2018. (ECF No. 10). The Court denied the Motion. (ECF No. 23)
21
E.
On multiple occasions, Lennar demanded that the Plaintiffs arbitrate their claims
22 regarding the Subject Properties.
23
F.
After extensive meeting and conferring, the Parties agree to arbitrate the
24 Claimants’ claims regarding the Subject Properties.
25
G.
The parties further agree to remand the action back to the Second Judicial District
26 Court, Washoe County, Nevada, so that the state court will retain jurisdiction over the action
27 pending arbitration.
28
-2STIPULATION REGARDING ARBITRATION PROTOCOL
.
1
AGREEMENT
2
WHEREFORE, The Parties hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE to the following:
3
1.
The above-captioned action shall be remanded to the Second Judicial District
4 Court, Washoe County, Nevada. The state court shall retain jurisdiction over the action pending
5 arbitration.
6
2.
The Parties further stipulate that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and
7 costs with respect to the removal and subsequent remand of this action pursuant to this stipulation
8
9
and order but such agreement shall have no effect and shall not be considered by any Court and/or
arbitrator in deciding whether to award attorneys’ fees and costs to either Party in pursuit and/or in
11
12
13
(702) 851-0300
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
6385 S. RAINBOW BLVD., SUITE 220
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89118
PAYNE & FEARS LLP
10
the conclusion of this Litigation as allowed under Nevada law.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: December 13, 2018
PAYNE & FEARS LLP
14
15
By:
16
17
Attorneys for Defendants
LENNAR RENO, LLC and LENNAR RENO,
LLC dba LENNAR HOMES
18
19
20
/s/ Sarah J. Odia
GREGORY H. KING, NV Bar No. 7777
SARAH J. ODIA, NV Bar No. 11053
DATED: December 13, 2018
MADDOX, SEGERBLOM and CANEPA, LLP
21
22
By:
24
/s/ Ardea G. Canepa-Rotoli
EVA G. SEGERBLOM, NV Bar No. 10749
ARDEA G. CANEPA-ROTOLI, NV Bar No.
12345
25
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
23
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION REGARDING ARBITRATION PROTOCOL
.
1
2
ORDER
The Court having reviewed the Parties Stipulation to Remand the above-captioned action
3 and good cause appearing, hereby ORDERS as follows:
4
1. The Parties’ Stipulation is approved; and
5
2. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada Case No.: 3:18-cv-00120-MMD-
6
WGC captioned, William G. and Melissa J. Kraus, et al. v. Lennar Reno, LLC, et al.,
7
is hereby remanded to the Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County, Nevada.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
11
12
____________________________________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
4850-0550-1314.1
13
(702) 851-0300
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
6385 S. RAINBOW BLVD., SUITE 220
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89118
PAYNE & FEARS LLP
December 13, 2018
10 Dated:__________________
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATION REGARDING ARBITRATION PROTOCOL
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?