Hall CA-NV, LLC v. Ladera Development LLC
Filing
109
ORDERED that the deadlines set forth in the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 95 ) are VACATED and will be re-set once the outstanding motions have been decided by the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/10/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
HALL CA-NV, LLC, a Texas limited
liability company,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
LADERA DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a
)
Nevada limited liability company,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________ )
3:18-cv-00124-RCJ-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
September 10, 2019
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
KAREN WALKER
REPORTER:
NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Discovery and Sixth Amended
Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 108). Defendant requests that the deadlines set
forth in the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 95) be extended sixty (60) days.
Due to the complexity of the outstanding motions and the demand on the court’s schedule,
it appears that a sixty (60) day extension of the scheduling order deadlines will not be sufficient.
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines set forth in the Scheduling Order (ECF No.
95) are VACATED and will be re-set once the outstanding motions have been decided by the
court.
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
By:
/s/______________________
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?