Hall CA-NV, LLC v. Ladera Development LLC
Filing
138
ORDER granting ECF No. 130 Motion to Strike and denying without prejudice ECF Nos. 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 and 128 Motions for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff is granted leave to refile a motion for summary judgment on or before June 28, 2021. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
HALL CA-NV, LLC,
a Texas limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
Case No. 3:18-cv-00124-RCJ-WGC
ORDER
vs.
LADERA DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
a Nevada limited liability company,
Defendant.
15
16
Plaintiff filed five separate motions for summary judgment totaling 124 pages excluding
17
exhibits. (ECF Nos. 124–28.) Defendant moves to strike these motions on the ground that they
18
violate the Court’s local rules (among other arguments). (ECF No. 130.) Specifically, Defendant
19
cites to LR 7-3(a), which reads, in pertinent part, “Motions for summary judgment . . . are limited
20
to 30 pages, excluding exhibits. . . . . Parties must not circumvent this rule by filing multiple
21
motions.” (emphasis added). The Court agrees with Defendant; the plain language of this rule
22
proscribes the filing of multiple motions for summary judgment without leave of this Court. The
23
Court may deny or strike any motion that is not filed in accordance with the local rules. See LR IA
24
10-1(d). The Court therefore grants Defendant’s motion and denies Plaintiff’s motions for
1 of 2
1
summary judgment without prejudice. Plaintiff may refile a motion for summary judgment by June
2
28, 2021. If Plaintiff truly needs to file more than thirty pages for the issues on summary judgment,
3
it may file a motion under LR 7-3(c) to exceed the page limits.
CONCLUSION
4
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Motion to Strike (ECF No. 130) is GRANTED.
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 124) is
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 125) is
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 126) is
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 127) is
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 128) is
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to refile a motion for summary
17
judgment on or before June 28, 2021.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
Dated June 7, 2021.
20
21
22
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
23
24
2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?