Hall CA-NV, LLC v. Ladera Development LLC

Filing 68

ORDER granting ECF No. 63 Stipulation To Extend Time re ECF No. 58 Objection (Second Request): Ladera's response due by 1/25/2019. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/22/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Case 3:18-cv-00124-RCJ-CBC Document 63 Filed 01/07/19 Page 1 of 4

1 DAVID C. MCELHINNEY
State Bar No. 33
2 KRISTEN L. MARTINI
State Bar No. 11272
3 LINDSEY HERZOG (AZ BAR NO. 032514)
(pro hac vice)
4 LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP
One East Liberty Street, Suite 300
5 Reno, Nevada 89501-2128
Tel: [phone]
6 E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
7
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant
8 Ladera Development, LLC
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

One East Liberty Street, Suite 300
Reno, Nevada 89501-2128

11

12 HALL CA-NV, LLC, a Texas limited
liability company,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
LADERA DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Nevada
16 limited liability company,
Defendant.

17

18 LADERA DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company,
19
Counterclaimant,
20
v.
21
HALL CA-NV, LLC, a Texas limited
22 liability company,

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR LADERA TO FILE
ITS RESPONSE TO HALL’S OBJECTION
TO ORDER DENYING HALL’S MOTION
TO MODIFY SUBPOENA DUCES
TECUM ON KOLESAR & LEATHAM
(ECF NO. 58)
(SECOND REQUEST)

Counterdefendant.

23
24

CASE NO. 3:18-cv-00124-RCJ-CBC

The parties, by and through their respective counsel have conducted a good faith meet
and confer in an attempt to address and resolve those issues raised in Hall’s Objection to Order
Denying Hall’s Motion to Modify Subpoena Duces Tecum on Kolesar & Leatham,
(“Objection”), (ECF No. 58) . As part of those ongoing discussions, and in order to give the
parties additional time to arrive at a successful resolution of the issues raised in the Objection,
106981671_1

Case 3:18-cv-00124-RCJ-CBC Document 63 Filed 01/07/19 Page 2 of 4

1 it was agreed between the parties that Ladera could, with the Court’s approval, have an
2 additional 2 weeks to file its Response to the Objection.
3

Therefore,

pursuant

to

Local

Rule

6-1,

Defendant/Counterclaimant

Ladera

4 Development, LLC (“Ladera”), and Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Hall CA-NV, LLC (“Hall”), by
5 and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for
6 Ladera to respond to Hall’s Objection to Order Denying Hall’s Motion To Modify Subpoena
7 Duces Tecum on Kolesar & Leatham (“Objection”) (ECF No. 58) filed on December 14, 2018.
8 Ladera’s response to Hall’s Objection was originally due on December 28, 2018. Pursuant to
9 the parties stipulation and this Court’s Order, (ECF No. 61) the time for Ladera to respond was
10 extended for the first time to Friday, January 11, 2019. Due to the nature of the ongoing

One East Liberty Street, Suite 300
Reno, Nevada 89501-2128

11 discussions as set forth above, the parties have agreed, for a second time, to extend Ladera’s
12 response time by an additional 14 days; thus, Ladera’s new response deadline is Friday,
13 January 25, 2019.

This is the second request for extension of time as regarding Hall’s

14 Objection. This request for a 14-day extension of time is made in good faith and is not
15 intended to delay the final determination of this matter.
16
17
18
19
20
21

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED, this 7th day of January, 2019:
In association with:

FAHRENDORF, VILORIA, OLIPHANT
& OSTER LLP
By: /s/ Nathan J. Aman
Nathan J. Aman, Esq.
P.O . Box 62
Reno, NV 89505
Email: [e-mail]

GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP
Frank J. Wright, Esq.
(by pro hac vice)
2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600
Dallas, TX 75201
Email: [e-mail]

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

22
23
24

LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP

By: /s/ David C. McElhinney
25 DAVID C. MCELHINNEY
KRISTEN L. MARTINI
26 LINDSEY HERZOG (pro hac vice)
One East Liberty Street, Suite 300
27 Reno, Nevada 89501-2128
28 Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant

106981671_1

2

Case 3:18-cv-00124-RCJ-CBC Document 63 Filed 01/07/19 Page 3 of 4

1
2
3

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22nd day
Dated this ___ day of of January, 2019.

, 2019.

4
5

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10

One East Liberty Street, Suite 300
Reno, Nevada 89501-2128

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

106981671_1

3

Case 3:18-cv-00124-RCJ-CBC Document 63 Filed 01/07/19 Page 4 of 4

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b), I certify that I am an employee of

3 LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP, and that on this 7th day of January, 2019, I
4 caused the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME (SECOND
5 REQUEST) FOR LADERA TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO HALL’S OBJECTION TO
6 ORDER DENYING HALL’S MOTION TO MODIFY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ON
7 KOLESAR & LEATHAM (ECF NO. 58) to be served by electronically filing the foregoing
8 document with the CM/ECF electronic filing system, which will send a notice of electronic
9 filing to the following:
10

13

Nathan J. Aman, Esq.
Fahrendorf, Viloria, Oliphant & Oster LLP
P.O . Box 62
Reno, NV 89505
Email: [e-mail]

Frank J. Wright, Esq. (by pro hac vice)
Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
2021 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1600
Dallas, TX 75201
Email: [e-mail]

14

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Attorneys for Plaintiff

One East Liberty Street, Suite 300
Reno, Nevada 89501-2128

11
12

15
16
17
18

/s/ Dawn M. Hayes
___
An employee of Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

106981671_1

4