Bonnet vs Nevada, State of, et al
Filing
12
ORDER granting ECF No. 11 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Fi<le Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8 ). Response due by 6/6/2018. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 5/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
4
5
Mark Mausert
NV Bar No. 2398
Cody Oldham
NV Bar No.14594
729 Evans Avenue
Reno, NV 89512
(775) 786-5477
Fax (775) 786-9658
mark@markmausertlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
BOBBY BONNET,
10
Case No.: 3:18-cv-00159-HDM-WGC
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
14
STATE OF NEVADA, DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION AND
DOES I-X,
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendants.
/
16
17
Plaintiff, BOBBY BONNET, and
Defendants STATE OF NEVADA ex. rel.
18
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION, by and through their undersigned counsels
19
of record, hereby stipulate and respectfully request an Order granting the Stipulation to extend the
20
deadline to file the Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss from May 23, 2018 to June 6, 2018.
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
27
28
Page 1 of 2
1
Plaintiff requests this extension due to counsel’s heavy work load and not for the purpose of
2
delay. There have been no other requests for extensions on this pleading or anything else in the case.
3
4
DATED this 21st day of May, 2018.
DATED this 21st day of May, 2018.
5
MARK MAUSERT LAW OFFICE
CHIEF DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
/s/ Cameron Vandenberg
CAMERON P. VANDENBERG
5420 Keitzke Lane, Suite 202
Reno, Nevada 89511
9
/s/ Mark Mausert
MARK MAUSERT
CODY OLDHAM
729 Evans Avenue
Reno, Nevada 89512
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendants
6
7
8
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
DATED this ____ day of May, 2018.
21st
15
16
__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?