Bonnet vs Nevada, State of, et al

Filing 12

ORDER granting ECF No. 11 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Fi<le Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8 ). Response due by 6/6/2018. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 5/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Mark Mausert NV Bar No. 2398 Cody Oldham NV Bar No.14594 729 Evans Avenue Reno, NV 89512 (775) 786-5477 Fax (775) 786-9658 mark@markmausertlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 BOBBY BONNET, 10 Case No.: 3:18-cv-00159-HDM-WGC Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 14 STATE OF NEVADA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION AND DOES I-X, 15 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. / 16 17 Plaintiff, BOBBY BONNET, and Defendants STATE OF NEVADA ex. rel. 18 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION, by and through their undersigned counsels 19 of record, hereby stipulate and respectfully request an Order granting the Stipulation to extend the 20 deadline to file the Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss from May 23, 2018 to June 6, 2018. 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 27 28 Page 1 of 2 1 Plaintiff requests this extension due to counsel’s heavy work load and not for the purpose of 2 delay. There have been no other requests for extensions on this pleading or anything else in the case. 3 4 DATED this 21st day of May, 2018. DATED this 21st day of May, 2018. 5 MARK MAUSERT LAW OFFICE CHIEF DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL /s/ Cameron Vandenberg CAMERON P. VANDENBERG 5420 Keitzke Lane, Suite 202 Reno, Nevada 89511 9 /s/ Mark Mausert MARK MAUSERT CODY OLDHAM 729 Evans Avenue Reno, Nevada 89512 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendants 6 7 8 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 DATED this ____ day of May, 2018. 21st 15 16 __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?