Bonnet vs Nevada, State of, et al
Filing
31
ORDER granting ECF No. 30 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Response to ECF No. 29 Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (First Request). Plaintiff's response due by 9/14/2018. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
4
5
Mark Mausert
NV Bar No. 2398
Cody Oldham
NV Bar No.14594
729 Evans Avenue
Reno, NV 89512
(775) 786-5477
Fax (775) 786-9658
mark@markmausertlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
BOBBY BONNET,
10
Case No.: 3:18-cv-00159-HDM-WGC
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
14
STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION DIVISION AND
DOES I-X,
15
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendants.
/
16
17
Plaintiff BOBBY BONNET, and Defendant STATE OF NEVADA ex rel DEPARTMENT
18
OF TRANSPORTATION, by and through their undersigned counsels of record, hereby stipulate and
19
respectfully request an Order granting the Stipulation to extend the deadline to file the Response to
20
Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings from August 31, 2018 to September 14, 2018.
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
28
Page 1 of 2
1
Plaintiff requests this extension due to counsel’s heavy work load.
2
3
DATED this 30th day of August, 2018.
DATED this 30th day of August, 2018.
4
MARK MAUSERT LAW OFFICE
CHIEF DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
/s/ Cameron Vandenberg
CAMERON P. VANDENBERG
5420 Kietzke Ln., Suite 202
Reno, Nevada 89511
8
/s/ Mark Mausert
MARK MAUSERT
CODY OLDHAM
729 Evans Avenue
Reno, Nevada 89512
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
5
6
7
Attorneys for Defendants
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
DATED this ____ day of ____________, 2018.
August
30th
14
15
16
__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?