Kelsey v. Baker et al

Filing 12

ORDER that ECF No. 11 Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time to respond to ECF No. 6 habeas corpus petition is granted; response/answer due by 8/30/2018; in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the Order entered May 16, 2018 (ECF No. 5 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 ZACHARY KELSEY, 10 Petitioner, ORDER v. 11 12 Case No. 3:18-cv-00174-MMD-VPC RENEE BAKER, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 In this habeas corpus action, Respondents filed a motion for extension of time 16 (ECF No. 11) on July 16, 2018, requesting a 45-day extension of time, to August 30, 17 2018, for their response to Zachary Kelsey’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. This would 18 be the first extension of this deadline. Respondents’ counsel states that the extension of 19 time is necessary because of the time it took to obtain the state-court record for the case, 20 and the time necessary to analyze that record. The Court finds that Respondents’ motion 21 for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and 22 that there is good cause for the extension of time requested. 23 It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 24 11) is granted. Respondents will have until August 30, 2018, to respond to the habeas 25 corpus petition. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 3 It is further ordered that, in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the Order entered May 16, 2018 (ECF No. 5) will remain in effect. DATED THIS 24th day of July 2018. 4 5 6 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?