Kelsey v. Baker et al
Filing
46
ORDER - It is ordered that Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 45 ) is granted. Respondents will have until December 13, 2021, to respond to Kelsey's supplemental brief. It is further ordered that, in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the Order entered July 15, 2021 (ECF No. 40 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/13/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
ZACHARY KELSEY,
7
8
9
Case No. 3:18-cv-00174-MMD-CLB
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
Respondents.
10
11
In this habeas corpus action, Respondents moved for an extension of time (ECF
12
No. 45) on October 12, 2021, requesting a 60-day extension of time, to December 13,
13
2021, in which to file their response to Kelsey’s supplemental brief. This is Respondents’
14
first request for an extension of this deadline, and Respondents represent that Kelsey
15
does not oppose the request. The Court finds that Respondents’ motion for extension of
16
time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay and that there is good
17
cause for the extension of time requested.
18
It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No.
19
45) is granted. Respondents will have until December 13, 2021, to respond to Kelsey’s
20
supplemental brief.
21
22
23
It is further ordered that, in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings
set forth in the Order entered July 15, 2021 (ECF No. 40) will remain in effect.
DATED THIS 13th Day of October 2021.
24
25
26
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?