Kelsey v. Baker et al
Filing
48
ORDER - Respondents' motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 47 ) is granted. Respondents will have until December 20, 2021, to respond to Kelsey's supplemental brief (ECF No. 44 ). In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the Order entered July 15, 2021 (ECF No. 40 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/15/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)
Case 3:18-cv-00174-MMD-CLB Document 48 Filed 12/15/21 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
ZACHARY KELSEY,
7
8
9
Case No. 3:18-cv-00174-MMD-CLB
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
Respondents.
10
11
In this habeas corpus action, Respondents have moved for a 7-day extension of
12
time in which to file their response to Kelsey’s supplemental brief. (ECF No. 47.) This is
13
Respondents’ second request for an extension of this deadline, and Respondents
14
represent that Kelsey does not oppose the request. The Court finds that the motion for
15
extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that
16
there is good cause for the extension of time requested.
17
It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ motion for enlargement of time (ECF No.
18
47) is granted. Respondents will have until December 20, 2021, to respond to Kelsey’s
19
supplemental brief.
20
21
22
It is further ordered that, in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings
set forth in the Order entered July 15, 2021 (ECF No. 40) will remain in effect.
DATED THIS 15th Day of December 2021.
23
24
25
26
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?