Smith v. Reno Newspapers, Inc.

Filing 10

ORDER granting ECF No. 9 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Answer to ECF No. 1 Complaint. Reno Newspapers, Inc. answer due 7/6/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 6/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
Case 3:18-cv-00234-LRH-WGC Document 9 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Rick R. Hsu, NV Bar # 5374 MAUPIN, COX & LeGOY 4785 Caughlin Parkway P. O. Box 30000 Reno, NV 89520 (775) 827-2000 (office) (775) 827-2185 (fax) rhsu@mcllawfirm.com Attorneys for Defendant Reno Newspapers, Inc. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 BARBARA SMITH, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 RENO NEWSPAPERS, INC. and DOES I – X, 14 Defendants. ) Case No.: 3:18-cv-00234-LRH-WGC ) ) ) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ) FILE ANSWER; ORDER ) ) ) ) ) 15 16 17 18 The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate that the deadline to for Defendant Reno Newspapers, Inc. to file an answer or paper in response to the Complaint (Dkt No. 3) is extended until Friday, July 6, 2018. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4785 Caughlin Pkwy Reno, Nevada 89519 (775) 827-2000 www.mcllawfirm.com [signature page to follow] 1 Case 3:18-cv-00234-LRH-WGC Document 9 Filed 06/15/18 Page 2 of 2 1 DATED this 13th day of June, 2018. 2 MAUPIN, COX & LEGOY 3 4 5 6 /s/ Mark Mausert, Esq.__________ Mark Mausert, No. 2398 Cody Oldham, No. 14594 729 Evans Ave. Reno, NV 89512 Attorneys for Plaintiff Barbara Smith By: /s/ Rick R. Hsu, Esq.________________ Rick R. Hsu, No. 5374 4785 Caughlin Parkway Reno, Nevada 89519 Attorneys for Defendant Reno Newspapers, Inc. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED 11 12 ____________________________________ _____________________________ U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 June 18, 2018 DATED:______________________ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4785 Caughlin Pkwy Reno, Nevada 89519 (775) 827-2000 www.mcllawfirm.com 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?