Smith v. Reno Newspapers, Inc.
Filing
10
ORDER granting ECF No. 9 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Answer to ECF No. 1 Complaint. Reno Newspapers, Inc. answer due 7/6/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 6/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
Case 3:18-cv-00234-LRH-WGC Document 9 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
Rick R. Hsu, NV Bar # 5374
MAUPIN, COX & LeGOY
4785 Caughlin Parkway
P. O. Box 30000
Reno, NV 89520
(775) 827-2000 (office)
(775) 827-2185 (fax)
rhsu@mcllawfirm.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Reno Newspapers, Inc.
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
BARBARA SMITH,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
RENO NEWSPAPERS, INC. and DOES I –
X,
14
Defendants.
) Case No.: 3:18-cv-00234-LRH-WGC
)
)
) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
) FILE ANSWER; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
15
16
17
18
The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate that
the deadline to for Defendant Reno Newspapers, Inc. to file an answer or paper in response to
the Complaint (Dkt No. 3) is extended until Friday, July 6, 2018.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
4785 Caughlin Pkwy
Reno, Nevada 89519
(775) 827-2000
www.mcllawfirm.com
[signature page to follow]
1
Case 3:18-cv-00234-LRH-WGC Document 9 Filed 06/15/18 Page 2 of 2
1
DATED this 13th day of June, 2018.
2
MAUPIN, COX & LEGOY
3
4
5
6
/s/ Mark Mausert, Esq.__________
Mark Mausert, No. 2398
Cody Oldham, No. 14594
729 Evans Ave.
Reno, NV 89512
Attorneys for Plaintiff Barbara Smith
By: /s/ Rick R. Hsu, Esq.________________
Rick R. Hsu, No. 5374
4785 Caughlin Parkway
Reno, Nevada 89519
Attorneys for Defendant Reno Newspapers, Inc.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED
11
12
____________________________________
_____________________________
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
June 18, 2018
DATED:______________________
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
4785 Caughlin Pkwy
Reno, Nevada 89519
(775) 827-2000
www.mcllawfirm.com
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?