Palmer v. Filson et al

Filing 60

ORDER - Respondents' unopposed motion for enlargement of time to respond to the second amended petition (ECF No. 59 ) is GRANTED. Respondents shall respond to the petition on or before January 28, 2022. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 1/21/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR)

Case 3:18-cv-00245-HDM-CLB Document 60 Filed 01/21/22 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9

MARKIECE PALMER,
Petitioner,

v.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

ORDER

WILLIAM GITTERE, et al.,

10
11

Case No. 3:18-cv-00245-HDM-CLB

Respondents.
Before the court are the petitioner’s three unopposed motions
for extension of time in which to file a second amended petition
(ECF Nos. 55, 56 & 57). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petitioner’s
motions

for

extension

of

time

are

granted

nunc

pro

tunc

to

September 29, 2021, and the second amended petition filed on that
date is deemed timely filed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ unopposed motion for
enlargement of time to respond to the second amended petition (ECF
No. 59) is GRANTED. Respondents shall respond to the petition on
or before January 28, 2022.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: This 21st day of January, 2022.
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
1