Torres v. The State of Nevada
Filing
3
ORDER that petitioner shall either file an IFP application or pay the $5 filing fee by 7/18/2018; failure to comply will result in the dismissal of this action; Clerk directed to send petitioner a blank IFP form (mailed along with instruc tions to petitioner on 6/18/2018); Clerk directed to send petitioner a petition for WHC form with instructions (mailed to petitioner on 6/18/2018); Petition for WHC due by 7/18/2018; failure to comply with this order will result in the dismiss al of this action; petitioner shall place the case number, 3:18-cv-00252-HDM-VPC, in the space provided on the form; Clerk directed to file the motion for extension of time to file parallel protective petition for writ of habeas corpus; the motion for extension of time to file parallel protective petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 6/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
JOSEPH TORRES,
12
13
14
Petitioner,
Case No. 3:18-cv-00252-HDM-VPC
ORDER
v.
STATE OF NEVADA,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner has filed a motion for extension of time to file parallel protective petition for
18
writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner’s commencement of the action in this manner has multiple
19
defects. First, petitioner has neither paid the filing fee of $5.00, nor has he filed an application to
20
proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner must take care of that problem before he can proceed.
21
Second, the only time limitation petitioner currently is under is the one-year statute of limitation
22
of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). The court has no power to extend that limitation. Petitioner is
23
responsible for filing a federal petition within that one-year period. Third, currently there is no
24
petition before the court. The motion for extension has no effect upon the timeliness of any later-
25
filed petition, because the motion for extension has no grounds to which a later-filed petition can
26
relate back. Petitioner needs to file an actual petition, and, to repeat, he alone is responsible for
27
filing it on time.
28
1
1
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner shall file an application for leave to
2
proceed in forma pauperis, accompanied by a signed financial certificate and a statement of his
3
inmate account. The clerk of the court shall send petitioner a blank application form for
4
incarcerated litigants. In the alternative, petitioner shall make the necessary arrangements to pay
5
the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00), accompanied by a copy of this order. Petitioner shall have
6
thirty (30) days from the date that this order is entered to comply. Failure to comply will result in
7
the dismissal of this action.
8
9
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall send petitioner a petition for
a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 form with instructions. Petitioner shall have
10
thirty (30) days from the date that this order is entered in which to file a petition. Neither the
11
foregoing deadline nor any extension thereof signifies or will signify any implied finding of a
12
basis for tolling during the time period established. Petitioner at all times remains responsible for
13
calculating the running of the federal limitation period under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) and timely
14
asserting claims. Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner shall place the case number, 3:18-cv-00252HDM-VPC, in the space provided on the form.
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk of the court file the motion for extension of
time to file parallel protective petition for writ of habeas corpus.
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the motion for extension of time to file parallel
protective petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.
DATED: June 18, 2018
22
______________________________
HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?