Torres v. The State of Nevada

Filing 3

ORDER that petitioner shall either file an IFP application or pay the $5 filing fee by 7/18/2018; failure to comply will result in the dismissal of this action; Clerk directed to send petitioner a blank IFP form (mailed along with instruc tions to petitioner on 6/18/2018); Clerk directed to send petitioner a petition for WHC form with instructions (mailed to petitioner on 6/18/2018); Petition for WHC due by 7/18/2018; failure to comply with this order will result in the dismiss al of this action; petitioner shall place the case number, 3:18-cv-00252-HDM-VPC, in the space provided on the form; Clerk directed to file the motion for extension of time to file parallel protective petition for writ of habeas corpus; the motion for extension of time to file parallel protective petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 6/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 JOSEPH TORRES, 12 13 14 Petitioner, Case No. 3:18-cv-00252-HDM-VPC ORDER v. STATE OF NEVADA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner has filed a motion for extension of time to file parallel protective petition for 18 writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner’s commencement of the action in this manner has multiple 19 defects. First, petitioner has neither paid the filing fee of $5.00, nor has he filed an application to 20 proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner must take care of that problem before he can proceed. 21 Second, the only time limitation petitioner currently is under is the one-year statute of limitation 22 of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). The court has no power to extend that limitation. Petitioner is 23 responsible for filing a federal petition within that one-year period. Third, currently there is no 24 petition before the court. The motion for extension has no effect upon the timeliness of any later- 25 filed petition, because the motion for extension has no grounds to which a later-filed petition can 26 relate back. Petitioner needs to file an actual petition, and, to repeat, he alone is responsible for 27 filing it on time. 28 1 1 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner shall file an application for leave to 2 proceed in forma pauperis, accompanied by a signed financial certificate and a statement of his 3 inmate account. The clerk of the court shall send petitioner a blank application form for 4 incarcerated litigants. In the alternative, petitioner shall make the necessary arrangements to pay 5 the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00), accompanied by a copy of this order. Petitioner shall have 6 thirty (30) days from the date that this order is entered to comply. Failure to comply will result in 7 the dismissal of this action. 8 9 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall send petitioner a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 form with instructions. Petitioner shall have 10 thirty (30) days from the date that this order is entered in which to file a petition. Neither the 11 foregoing deadline nor any extension thereof signifies or will signify any implied finding of a 12 basis for tolling during the time period established. Petitioner at all times remains responsible for 13 calculating the running of the federal limitation period under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) and timely 14 asserting claims. Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner shall place the case number, 3:18-cv-00252HDM-VPC, in the space provided on the form. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk of the court file the motion for extension of time to file parallel protective petition for writ of habeas corpus. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the motion for extension of time to file parallel protective petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. DATED: June 18, 2018 22 ______________________________ HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?