Penrose v. First Magnus Financial Corporation, et al.
Filing
19
ORDER that the Motion to Reconsider (ECF No. 16 ) is DENIED; Clerk directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/24/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
______________________________________
)
)
HERBERT PENROSE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
FIRST MAGNUS FINANCIAL CORP. et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
)
3:18-cv-00276-RCJ-VPC
ORDER
12
Plaintiff sued Defendants in this Court to prevent the nonjudicial foreclosure of property
13
14
in which he claimed an interest. The Court denied preliminary injunctive relief and granted a
15
motion to dismiss, because the action was precluded by prior state court judgments. Moreover,
16
recorded documents of which the Court could take judicial notice negated allegations concerning
17
the loan origination, and the remaining allegations were based on invalid legal theories. The
18
Court directed the Clerk to close the case but did not enter a separate judgment. Plaintiff has
19
asked the Court to reconsider, but there is no basis to reconsider. Plaintiff identifies no newly
20
discovered evidence or intervening change in the law.
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
1 of 2
CONCLUSION
1
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Reconsider (ECF No. 16) is DENIED.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated this 14th day January, 2019.
Dated this 24th day ofof January, 2019.
6
7
8
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?