Penrose v. First Magnus Financial Corporation, et al.

Filing 19

ORDER that the Motion to Reconsider (ECF No. 16 ) is DENIED; Clerk directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/24/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ______________________________________ ) ) HERBERT PENROSE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) FIRST MAGNUS FINANCIAL CORP. et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 3:18-cv-00276-RCJ-VPC ORDER 12 Plaintiff sued Defendants in this Court to prevent the nonjudicial foreclosure of property 13 14 in which he claimed an interest. The Court denied preliminary injunctive relief and granted a 15 motion to dismiss, because the action was precluded by prior state court judgments. Moreover, 16 recorded documents of which the Court could take judicial notice negated allegations concerning 17 the loan origination, and the remaining allegations were based on invalid legal theories. The 18 Court directed the Clerk to close the case but did not enter a separate judgment. Plaintiff has 19 asked the Court to reconsider, but there is no basis to reconsider. Plaintiff identifies no newly 20 discovered evidence or intervening change in the law. 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 1 of 2 CONCLUSION 1 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Reconsider (ECF No. 16) is DENIED. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated this 14th day January, 2019. Dated this 24th day ofof January, 2019. 6 7 8 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?