Evans v. Dzurenda et al

Filing 57

ORDER granting ECF No. 56 Stipulation. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint due by 10/9/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/8/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)

Download PDF
Case 3:18-cv-00283-RCJ-WGC Document 57 Filed 09/08/20 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 MARGARET A. MCLETCHIE, Nevada Bar No. 10931 ALINA M. SHELL, Nevada Bar No. 11711 MCLETCHIE LAW 701 East Bridger Ave., Suite 520 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 728-5300 Facsimile: (702) 425-8220 Email: maggie@nvlitigation.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Todd Evans 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 TODD EVANS, Plaintiff, 11 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520 LAS VEGAS, NV 89101 (702)728-5300 (T) / (702)425-8220 (F) WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM 12 13 Case No.: 3:18-cv-00283-RCJ-WGC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF No. 41) vs. JAMES DZURENDA, et al., 14 15 Defendants. (FOURTH REQUEST) 16 17 Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff TODD EVANS and Defendants JAMES 18 DZURENDA, ROMEO ARANAS, JOHN KEAST, DR. JONES, and DR. MAR 19 (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and 20 request that this Court extend the deadline for Plaintiff TODD EVANS to file his Amended 21 Complaint, pursuant to Screening Order (ECF No. 41), by an additional sixty (60) days, 22 extending the deadline from September 9, 2020 to November 5, 2020. 23 This Request for an extension of time is not sought for any improper purpose or 24 other purpose of delay. This is the fourth request for an extension in this matter. This request 25 for extension is based upon the following: 26 Counsel for Plaintiff TODD EVANS is class counsel in In re: HCV Prison 27 Litigation, Case No. 3:19-cv-0577-MMD-CLB.4 In that suit, which has been certified as a 28 class action (see In re: HCV Prison Litigation, ECF No. 21), the class representatives are 1 Case 3:18-cv-00283-RCJ-WGC Document 57 Filed 09/08/20 Page 2 of 3 1 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief regarding NDOC’s failure to provide treatment for 2 chronic HCV. Pursuant to the Court’s order certifying the class in the In re: HCV Prison 3 Litigation, the class consists of all persons: (a) who are or will be in the legal custody of 4 NDOC; (b) who have been incarcerated for at least 21 days and have at least 12 weeks 5 remaining on their sentence; (c) who have been diagnosed with chronic HCV and are 6 candidates for DAA treatment pursuant to the proper medical standard of care; and (d) for 7 whom DAA treatment has been or will be denied, withheld, or delayed based on policies or 8 considerations that deviate from the proper medical standard of care. (In re: HCV Prison 9 Litigation, ECF No. 21, p. 17:17-23.) The Court has conducted a multi-day settlement conference in that matter (see In 11 re: HCV Prison Litigation, ECF Nos. 54, 55, and 59 (minutes of settlement conference).) 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520 LAS VEGAS, NV 89101 (702)728-5300 (T) / (702)425-8220 (F) WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM 10 The parties have submitted a proposed settlement (consent decree) to the Court for 13 preliminary approval. (ECF No. 61.) The Court has scheduled a fairness hearing for October 14 27, 2020. (ECF No. 63 (amended minute order setting fairness hearing.) Because the 15 proposed consent decree relates to Mr. Evans’ claims regarding denial of treatment for his 16 chronic HCV, this additional extension of time is necessary so that counsel can determine 17 whether the Court will approve the consent decree, and to assess the impact of that consent 18 decree on Mr. Evans’ claims. 19 Counsel for Plaintiff TODD EVANS also requires this additional extension of time 20 due to conflicting deadlines in other cases. Specifically, counsel Alina M. Shell is counsel in 21 In Re: D.O.T. Litigation (Eighth Judicial District Court Case No. A-19-787004-B). Ms. Shell 22 has been in trial in the In Re: D.O.T. Litigation matter since July 13, 2020. The first phase of 23 trial ended on August 18, 2020, and the second phase of trial is scheduled to begin on 24 September 8, 2020. The undersigned has had to dedicate substantial time to participating in 25 trial and attending to matters related to trial. 26 Further, counsel for Mr. Evans has conflicting deadlines, such as dispositive motion 27 filings due on September 9, 2020 in another matter, Las Vegas Review-Journal v. Las Vegas 28 Metropolitan Police Department, Eighth Judicial District Court Case No. A-18-775378-W, 2 Case 3:18-cv-00283-RCJ-WGC Document 57 Filed 09/08/20 Page 3 of 3 1 a Reply to Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus due on September 14, 2020 in Joanna 2 Sarah Weller v. Eighth Judicial District Court, Nevada Supreme Court Case No. 81685, and 3 a mediation statement due on September 16, 2020 in Huffman, et al. v. Bertsch, CPA, Nevada 4 Supreme Court Case No. 81330. Accordingly, counsel requires additional time to adequately 5 represent Mr. Evans’ interests in this matter. 6 7 8 9 WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file his Amended Complaint to up to and including October 9, 2020. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED this 8th day of September, 2020. DATED this 8th day of September, 2020. MCLETCHIE LAW ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE 10 11 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520 LAS VEGAS, NV 89101 (702)728-5300 (T) / (702)425-8220 (F) WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM 12 13 14 15 /s/ Alina M. Shell Margaret A. McLetchie, NBN 10931 Alina M. Shell, NBN 11711 701 E. Bridger Ave., Suite 520 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorneys of Plaintiff Todd Evans /s/ Douglas R. Rands Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney General Douglas R. Rands, Nevada Bar No. 3572 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 Attorneys for Defendants 16 17 18 19 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 22 23 HONORABLE JUDGE WILLIAM G. COBB DATED: 24 25 26 27 28 3 September 8, 2020.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?