Evans v. Dzurenda et al
Filing
57
ORDER granting ECF No. 56 Stipulation. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint due by 10/9/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/8/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
Case 3:18-cv-00283-RCJ-WGC Document 57 Filed 09/08/20 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
MARGARET A. MCLETCHIE, Nevada Bar No. 10931
ALINA M. SHELL, Nevada Bar No. 11711
MCLETCHIE LAW
701 East Bridger Ave., Suite 520
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: (702) 728-5300
Facsimile: (702) 425-8220
Email: maggie@nvlitigation.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Todd Evans
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
TODD EVANS,
Plaintiff,
11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520
LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
(702)728-5300 (T) / (702)425-8220 (F)
WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM
12
13
Case No.: 3:18-cv-00283-RCJ-WGC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE
AMENDED COMPLAINT
(ECF No. 41)
vs.
JAMES DZURENDA, et al.,
14
15
Defendants.
(FOURTH REQUEST)
16
17
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff TODD EVANS and Defendants JAMES
18
DZURENDA, ROMEO ARANAS, JOHN KEAST, DR. JONES, and DR. MAR
19
(collectively “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and
20
request that this Court extend the deadline for Plaintiff TODD EVANS to file his Amended
21
Complaint, pursuant to Screening Order (ECF No. 41), by an additional sixty (60) days,
22
extending the deadline from September 9, 2020 to November 5, 2020.
23
This Request for an extension of time is not sought for any improper purpose or
24
other purpose of delay. This is the fourth request for an extension in this matter. This request
25
for extension is based upon the following:
26
Counsel for Plaintiff TODD EVANS is class counsel in In re: HCV Prison
27
Litigation, Case No. 3:19-cv-0577-MMD-CLB.4 In that suit, which has been certified as a
28
class action (see In re: HCV Prison Litigation, ECF No. 21), the class representatives are
1
Case 3:18-cv-00283-RCJ-WGC Document 57 Filed 09/08/20 Page 2 of 3
1
seeking declaratory and injunctive relief regarding NDOC’s failure to provide treatment for
2
chronic HCV. Pursuant to the Court’s order certifying the class in the In re: HCV Prison
3
Litigation, the class consists of all persons: (a) who are or will be in the legal custody of
4
NDOC; (b) who have been incarcerated for at least 21 days and have at least 12 weeks
5
remaining on their sentence; (c) who have been diagnosed with chronic HCV and are
6
candidates for DAA treatment pursuant to the proper medical standard of care; and (d) for
7
whom DAA treatment has been or will be denied, withheld, or delayed based on policies or
8
considerations that deviate from the proper medical standard of care. (In re: HCV Prison
9
Litigation, ECF No. 21, p. 17:17-23.)
The Court has conducted a multi-day settlement conference in that matter (see In
11
re: HCV Prison Litigation, ECF Nos. 54, 55, and 59 (minutes of settlement conference).)
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520
LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
(702)728-5300 (T) / (702)425-8220 (F)
WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM
10
The parties have submitted a proposed settlement (consent decree) to the Court for
13
preliminary approval. (ECF No. 61.) The Court has scheduled a fairness hearing for October
14
27, 2020. (ECF No. 63 (amended minute order setting fairness hearing.) Because the
15
proposed consent decree relates to Mr. Evans’ claims regarding denial of treatment for his
16
chronic HCV, this additional extension of time is necessary so that counsel can determine
17
whether the Court will approve the consent decree, and to assess the impact of that consent
18
decree on Mr. Evans’ claims.
19
Counsel for Plaintiff TODD EVANS also requires this additional extension of time
20
due to conflicting deadlines in other cases. Specifically, counsel Alina M. Shell is counsel in
21
In Re: D.O.T. Litigation (Eighth Judicial District Court Case No. A-19-787004-B). Ms. Shell
22
has been in trial in the In Re: D.O.T. Litigation matter since July 13, 2020. The first phase of
23
trial ended on August 18, 2020, and the second phase of trial is scheduled to begin on
24
September 8, 2020. The undersigned has had to dedicate substantial time to participating in
25
trial and attending to matters related to trial.
26
Further, counsel for Mr. Evans has conflicting deadlines, such as dispositive motion
27
filings due on September 9, 2020 in another matter, Las Vegas Review-Journal v. Las Vegas
28
Metropolitan Police Department, Eighth Judicial District Court Case No. A-18-775378-W,
2
Case 3:18-cv-00283-RCJ-WGC Document 57 Filed 09/08/20 Page 3 of 3
1
a Reply to Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus due on September 14, 2020 in Joanna
2
Sarah Weller v. Eighth Judicial District Court, Nevada Supreme Court Case No. 81685, and
3
a mediation statement due on September 16, 2020 in Huffman, et al. v. Bertsch, CPA, Nevada
4
Supreme Court Case No. 81330. Accordingly, counsel requires additional time to adequately
5
represent Mr. Evans’ interests in this matter.
6
7
8
9
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court extend the deadline
for Plaintiff to file his Amended Complaint to up to and including October 9, 2020.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED this 8th day of September, 2020.
DATED this 8th day of September, 2020.
MCLETCHIE LAW
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE
10
11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520
LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
(702)728-5300 (T) / (702)425-8220 (F)
WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM
12
13
14
15
/s/ Alina M. Shell
Margaret A. McLetchie, NBN 10931
Alina M. Shell, NBN 11711
701 E. Bridger Ave., Suite 520
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Attorneys of Plaintiff Todd Evans
/s/ Douglas R. Rands
Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney General
Douglas R. Rands, Nevada Bar No. 3572
100 N. Carson Street
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717
Attorneys for Defendants
16
17
18
19
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
22
23
HONORABLE JUDGE WILLIAM G. COBB
DATED:
24
25
26
27
28
3
September 8, 2020.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?