Evans v. Dzurenda et al

Filing 59

ORDER granting ECF No. 58 Stipulation. Plaintiff shall have up to and including December 7, 2020, to file his Amended Complaint. There shall be no further extensions granted barring unforeseen and extenuating circumstances. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 11/5/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MARGARET A. MCLETCHIE, Nevada Bar No. 10931 ALINA M. SHELL, Nevada Bar No. 11711 MCLETCHIE LAW 701 East Bridger Ave., Suite 520 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 728-5300 Facsimile: (702) 425-8220 Email: maggie@nvlitigation.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Todd Evans UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 TODD EVANS, Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:18-cv-00283-RCJ-WGC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF No. 41) vs. 11 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520 LAS VEGAS, NV 89101 (702)728-5300 (T) / (702)425-8220 (F) WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM 12 JAMES DZURENDA, et al., Defendants. (FIFTH REQUEST) 13 14 Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff TODD EVANS and Defendants JAMES 15 DZURENDA, ROMEO ARANAS, JOHN KEAST, DR. JONES, and DR. MAR 16 (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and 17 request that this Court extend the deadline for Plaintiff TODD EVANS to file his Amended 18 Complaint, pursuant to Screening Order (ECF No. 41), by an additional thirty (30) days, 19 extending the deadline from November 5, 2020 to December 7, 2020. 20 This Request for an extension of time is not sought for any improper purpose or 21 other purpose of delay. This is the fifth request for an extension in this matter. This request 22 for extension is based upon the following: 23 Counsel for Plaintiff TODD EVANS requires this additional extension of time due 24 to conflicting deadlines in other cases. Specifically, counsel for Mr. Evans has several 25 conflicting state and federal court deadlines, such as a Reply Brief due on November 3, 2020 26 in Las Vegas Review-Journal v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Eighth Judicial 27 28 District Court Case No. A-20-811063-W which required substantial time and resources; an informal settlement conference on November 5, 2020 in a federal civil rights matter; an 1 1 Answer due on November 5, 2020 in NuLeaf Inc. v. SH Parent, Inc., Eighth Judicial 2 District Court Case No. A-20-813752-B; a hearing in state district court on November 5, 3 2020 in Las Vegas Review-Journal v. Clark County School District, Eighth Judicial 4 District Court Case No. A-17-750151-W, an Arbitration Statement due on November 6, 5 2020 in Colvin 1997 Trust v. Shelley Colvin, Eighth Judicial District Court Case No. 6 7 8 9 10 11 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 701 EAST BRIDGER AVE., SUITE 520 LAS VEGAS, NV 89101 (702)728-5300 (T) / (702)425-8220 (F) WWW.NVLITIGATION.COM 12 A-19-806162-C in advance of a November 20, 2020 arbitration; and contested hearings in state district court on November 5, 9 and 10, 2020. Accordingly, counsel requires additional time to adequately represent Mr. Evans’ interests in this matter. WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file his Amended Complaint to up to and including December 7, 2020. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 13 14 15 DATED this 4th day of November, 2020. DATED this 4th day of November, 2020. MCLETCHIE LAW ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE 16 17 18 19 20 /s/ Douglas R. Rands Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney General Douglas R. Rands, Nevada Bar No. 3572 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 Attorneys for Defendants /s/ Alina M. Shell Margaret A. McLetchie, NBN 10931 Alina M. Shell, NBN 11711 701 E. Bridger Ave., Suite 520 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorneys of Plaintiff Todd Evans 21 22 ORDER 23 There shall be no further extensions granted barring unforeseen and extenuating 24 circumstances. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 HONORABLE JUDGE WILLIAM G. COBB 27 28 DATED: November 5, 2020 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?