Tesla, Inc. v. Tripp

Filing 189

ORDER granting ECF No. 188 Stipulation : Replies to ECF Nos. 177 , 178 Responses re ECF Nos. 154 , 155 Motions for Summary Judgment due by 6/2/2020. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/11/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Case 3:18-cv-00296-LRH-CLB Document 188 Filed 05/07/20 Page 1 of 2
189
05/11/20

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

MCDONALD CARANO LLP
Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416)
2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200
Las Vegas, NV 89102
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Alex Spiro (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10010
Telephone: [phone]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Michael T. Lifrak (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Jeanine M. Zalduendo (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Aubrey Jones (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-2543
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter Defendant
TESLA, INC.

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

17
18
19
20
21

TESLA, INC.,
v.
MARTIN TRIPP,

Plaintiff,

Defendant.

22

24

26
27
28

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
(First Request)

23

25

CLB
Case No. 3:18-cv-00296-LRH-CBC

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

Case 3:18-cv-00296-LRH-CLB Document 188 Filed 05/07/20 Page 2 of 2
189
05/11/20

1

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rules IA 6-1 and 7-1,

2

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Tesla, Inc. and Defendant/Counterclaimant Martin Tripp, by and

3

through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to and request a mutual two-week extension of time

4

to file their respective replies in support of their motions for summary judgment. The parties’

5

motions for summary judgment [ECF No. 154 and ECF No. 155] were filed March 31, 2020, and

6

the parties’ oppositions [ECF No. 177 and ECF No. 178] were filed May 5, 2020. The responses

7

are currently due on May 19, 2020. The basis for this request is that counsel for both parties

8

continue to experience logistical challenges in their respective offices brought about by the

9

COVID-19 pandemic. The parties previously requested and were granted a two-week extension

10

of time with regard to filing their oppositions, and seek a similar extension by this stipulation.

11

There is no trial date set, and this extension will not affect any other scheduling deadlines.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

For the foregoing reasons, the parties stipulate and respectfully request an extension of
time until June 2, 2020 to file their respective replies to the motions for summary judgment.
DATED this 6th day of May, 2020.
TIFFANY & BOSCO, P.A.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

By: /s/William M. Fischbach
Robert D. Mitchell
William M. Fischbach III
Camelback Esplanade II
Seventh Floor
2525 East Camelback Road
Phoenix, Arizona 85016-4229

By: /s/Rory T. Kay
Michael Lifrak
Jeanine M. Zalduendo
Aubrey Jones
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017

10100 W. Charleston Blvd., #220
Las Vegas, NV 89135

Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416)
MCDONALD CARANO LLP
2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200
Las Vegas, NV 89102

Counsel for Defendant/
Counterclaimant

Counsel for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant
ORDER

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

DATED this 11th day of May, 2020.
Date:
Larry R. Hicks
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2