Tesla, Inc. v. Tripp

Filing 191

ORDER granting ECF No. 190 Stipulation. The Parties shall have until June 9, 2020 to file their respective replies to the Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 154 , 155 ). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/26/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

Case 3:18-cv-00296-LRH-CLB Document 190 Filed 05/22/20 Page 1 of 2
191
05/26/20

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

MCDONALD CARANO LLP
Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416)
[e-mail]
2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200
Las Vegas, NV 89102
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Alex Spiro (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10010
Telephone: [phone]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Michael T. Lifrak (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Jeanine M. Zalduendo (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Aubrey Jones (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-2543
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter Defendant
TESLA, INC.

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

18
19

TESLA, INC.,

20

v.

21

MARTIN TRIPP,

22

Plaintiff,

Defendant.

24

26
27
28

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
(Second Request)

23

25

Case No. 3:18-cv-00296-LRH-CBC

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

Case 3:18-cv-00296-LRH-CLB Document 190 Filed 05/22/20 Page 2 of 2
191
05/26/20

1

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rules IA 6-1 and 7-1,

2

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Tesla, Inc. and Defendant/Counterclaimant Martin Tripp, by and

3

through undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to and request a mutual one-week extension of time

4

to file their respective replies in support of their motions for summary judgment. The parties’

5

motions for summary judgment [ECF No. 154 and ECF No. 155] were filed March 31, 2020, and

6

the parties’ oppositions [ECF No. 177 and ECF No. 178] were filed May 5, 2020. Per the terms

7

of a prior stipulation, the replies are currently due on June 2, 2020. The basis for this request is

8

that counsel for both parties are experiencing the ongoing logistical challenges in their respective

9

offices brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic. The parties previously requested and were

10

granted a two-week extension of time with regard to filing their replies, and they now seek an

11

additional one-week extension by this stipulation. There is no trial date set, and this extension

12

will not affect any other scheduling deadlines.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

For the foregoing reasons, the parties stipulate and respectfully request an extension of
time until June 9, 2020 to file their respective replies to the motions for summary judgment.
DATED this 22nd day of May, 2020.
TIFFANY & BOSCO, P.A.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

By: /s/William M. Fischbach
Robert D. Mitchell
William M. Fischbach III
Camelback Esplanade II
Seventh Floor
2525 East Camelback Road
Phoenix, Arizona 85016-4229

By: /s/Rory T. Kay
Michael Lifrak
Jeanine M. Zalduendo
Aubrey Jones
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017

Counsel for
Defendant/Counterclaimant
ORDER

25
26
27
28

Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416)
MCDONALD CARANO LLP
2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200
Las Vegas, NV 89102
Counsel for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

10100 W. Charleston Blvd., #220
Las Vegas, NV 89135

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 26th day of May, 2020.
Date:

Larry R. Hicks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2