Tesla, Inc. v. Tripp

Filing 223

ORDER - The court has reviewed Tesla's emergency motion for order to show cause (ECF No. 220 ) and finds that the "emergency" motion is not, in fact, an emergency. Thus the normal briefing schedule as outlined in Local Rule 7-2(b) will apply. Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DN)

Case 3:18-cv-00296-MMD-CLB Document 223 Filed 10/08/20 Page 1 of 1

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4
5

TESLA, INC.,

6

Case No. 3:18-CV-00296-MMD-CLB
Plaintiff,

7

v.

8

ORDER

MARTIN TRIPP,

9

Defendant.

10
11

The court has received Plaintiff Tesla’s emergency motion for order to show cause

12

and hearing, (ECF No. 220), filed on October 8, 2020. Upon review of the motion and the

13

accompanying declaration and exhibits (ECF Nos. 221, 222), the court finds that the

14

“emergency” motion is not, in fact, an emergency. See Local Rule 7-4(c). Thus, the

15

normal briefing schedule as outlined in Local Rule 7-2(b) will apply.

16

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that a response to the motion for order to show

17

cause is due by October 22, 2020, and any reply is due seven (7) days after service of

18
19
20

the response.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 8, 2020
DATED: ______________________

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

___________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE