Franklin v. State of Nevada et al

Filing 188

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE on ECF No. 187 Stipulation. Each party to bear his own costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 9/24/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 AARON D. FORD Attorney General DOUGAS R. RANDS, Bar No. 3572 Senior Deputy Attorney General JANET E. TRAUT, Bar No. 8695 Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 Tel: (775) 684-1120 E-mail: jtraut@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendant Julio Mesa 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 TERON FRANKLIN, 12 Case No. 3:18-cv-00522-CLB Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 JULIE MESA, et al., 15 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Defendants. 16 17 By order of the Court, Plaintiff, Teron Franklin, by and through counsel, Meng 18 Zhong and Brittni Tanenbaum, of Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP and Defendant, 19 Julio Mesa, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of 20 Nevada, and Douglas R. Rands, Senior Deputy Attorney General, and Janet Traut, 21 Deputy Attorney General, 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Page 1 126205160.1 1 hereby stipulate that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with prejudice by 2 order of this Court, with each party to bear his own costs. 3 DATED this 24th day of September 2024 DATED this 24th day of September 2024 4 LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP AARON D. FORD Attorney General 5 6 7 8 9 By: /s/Meng Zhong________________________ By: /s/Douglas R. Rands MENG ZHONG, Bar No. 12145 DOUGLAS R. RANDS, Bar No. 3572 BRITTNI A. TANENBAUM, Bar No. 16013 Senior Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 ________________________________ US MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 September 24, 2024 DATED: _________________________ 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 126205160.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?