Franklin v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
188
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE on ECF No. 187 Stipulation. Each party to bear his own costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 9/24/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
DOUGAS R. RANDS, Bar No. 3572
Senior Deputy Attorney General
JANET E. TRAUT, Bar No. 8695
Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
100 N. Carson Street
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717
Tel: (775) 684-1120
E-mail: jtraut@ag.nv.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
Julio Mesa
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
TERON FRANKLIN,
12
Case No. 3:18-cv-00522-CLB
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
JULIE MESA, et al.,
15
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
Defendants.
16
17
By order of the Court, Plaintiff, Teron Franklin, by and through counsel, Meng
18
Zhong and Brittni Tanenbaum, of Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP and Defendant,
19
Julio Mesa, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of
20
Nevada, and Douglas R. Rands, Senior Deputy Attorney General, and Janet Traut,
21
Deputy Attorney General,
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
Page 1
126205160.1
1
hereby stipulate that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with prejudice by
2
order of this Court, with each party to bear his own costs.
3
DATED this 24th day of September 2024
DATED this 24th day of September 2024
4
LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER
CHRISTIE LLP
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
5
6
7
8
9
By: /s/Meng Zhong________________________ By: /s/Douglas R. Rands
MENG ZHONG, Bar No. 12145
DOUGLAS R. RANDS, Bar No. 3572
BRITTNI A. TANENBAUM, Bar No. 16013
Senior Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendants
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
________________________________
US MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
September 24, 2024
DATED: _________________________
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2
126205160.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?