Cordova v. Baca et al
Filing
58
ORDERED that Respondents' motions for leave to file exhibits under seal (ECF Nos. 51 , 55 ) are granted. It is further ordered that Petitioner's unopposed motion for extension of time (ECF No. 57 ) is granted. Petitioner will have up to and including January 3, 2022, to file a reply to the answer (ECF No. 49). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/19/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
HAROLD CORDOVA,
Case No. 3:19-cv-00388-MMD-CLB
Petitioner,
7
ORDER
v.
8
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
9
Respondents.
10
11
This is a habeas corpus matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondents filed two
12
motions for leave to file exhibit under seal. (ECF Nos. 51, 55.) The exhibits in question
13
are a psychiatric evaluation and a pre-sentence investigation report, both of which contain
14
confidential information. The Court finds that compelling reasons exist to grant the motion
15
and seal these exhibits. See Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172,
16
1178-79 (9th Cir. 2006).
17
18
19
20
Petitioner Harold Cordova has filed an unopposed motion for extension of time
(second request). (ECF No. 57.) The Court finds good cause exists to grant the motion.
It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ motions for leave to file exhibits under
seal (ECF Nos. 51, 55) are granted.
21
It is further ordered that Petitioner’s unopposed motion for extension of time (ECF
22
No. 57) is granted. Petitioner will have up to and including January 3, 2022, to file a reply
23
to the answer (ECF No. 49).
24
DATED THIS 19th Day of November 2021.
25
26
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?