Cordova v. Baca et al

Filing 58

ORDERED that Respondents' motions for leave to file exhibits under seal (ECF Nos. 51 , 55 ) are granted. It is further ordered that Petitioner's unopposed motion for extension of time (ECF No. 57 ) is granted. Petitioner will have up to and including January 3, 2022, to file a reply to the answer (ECF No. 49). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/19/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 HAROLD CORDOVA, Case No. 3:19-cv-00388-MMD-CLB Petitioner, 7 ORDER v. 8 ISIDRO BACA, et al., 9 Respondents. 10 11 This is a habeas corpus matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondents filed two 12 motions for leave to file exhibit under seal. (ECF Nos. 51, 55.) The exhibits in question 13 are a psychiatric evaluation and a pre-sentence investigation report, both of which contain 14 confidential information. The Court finds that compelling reasons exist to grant the motion 15 and seal these exhibits. See Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 16 1178-79 (9th Cir. 2006). 17 18 19 20 Petitioner Harold Cordova has filed an unopposed motion for extension of time (second request). (ECF No. 57.) The Court finds good cause exists to grant the motion. It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ motions for leave to file exhibits under seal (ECF Nos. 51, 55) are granted. 21 It is further ordered that Petitioner’s unopposed motion for extension of time (ECF 22 No. 57) is granted. Petitioner will have up to and including January 3, 2022, to file a reply 23 to the answer (ECF No. 49). 24 DATED THIS 19th Day of November 2021. 25 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?