Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Soundview Home Loan Trust 2006 EQ2 Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-EQ2 v. Chicago Title Insurance Company et al

Filing 50

ORDER granting ECF No. 49 Stipulation for Extension Time. IT IS SO STIPULATED that Chicago Title's deadline to file its reply in support of its motion to dismiss (ECF No. 28 ) and to oppose Deutsche Bank's countermotion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 48) is hereby extended through and including Friday, February 17, 2023 (2/17/2023). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/19/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)

Download PDF
Case 3:19-cv-00649-RCJ-CLB Document 50 Filed 01/19/23 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 18 19 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, 20 21 vs. 22 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 23 Defendants. Case No.: 3:19-CV-00649-RCJ-CLB ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST REQUEST 24 COMES NOW defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company (“Chicago Title”) and 25 plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Deutsche Bank”), by and through their 26 respective attorneys of record, which hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 27 1. On October 11, 2022 Deutsche Bank filed its First Amended Complaint in this 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MTD Case 3:19-cv-00649-RCJ-CLB Document 50 Filed 01/19/23 Page 2 of 3 1 action (ECF No. 27); 2 3 2. complaint (ECF No. 28); 4 5 On November 10, 2022 Chicago Title moved to dismiss Deutsche Bank’s 3. On January 11, 2023 Deutsche Bank opposed Chicago Title’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 47) and filed a countermotion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 48); 6 4. Counsel for Chicago Title requests a 30-day extension to reply in support of its 7 motion to dismiss and a 16-day extension to oppose the countermotion, such that Chicago Title’s 8 reply in support of motion to dismiss and opposition to the countermotion are both due on 9 February 17, 2023, to afford Chicago Title’s counsel additional time to review and respond to 10 Deutsche Bank’s opposition and countermotion, which are identical. 11 5. Counsel for Deutsche Bank does not oppose the requested extension; 12 6. This is the first request for an extension made by counsel for Chicago Title, which 13 is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay. 14 7. This stipulation is entered into without waiving any of Chicago Title’s objections 15 under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12. 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MTD Case 3:19-cv-00649-RCJ-CLB Document 50 49 Filed 01/19/23 01/17/23 Page 3 of 3 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED that Chicago Title’s deadline to file its reply in support of its 2 motion to dismiss and to oppose Deutsche Bank’s countermotion for partial summary judgment is 3 hereby extended through and including Friday, February 17, 2023. 4 Dated: January 12, 2023 SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP 5 6 By: 7 8 9 Dated: January 12, 2023 /s/-Kevin S. Sinclair KEVIN S. SINCLAIR Attorneys for Defendants CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP 10 By: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 /s/-Lindsay D. Dragon LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY IT IS SO ORDERED. January 19th day of _____________, Dated this _____ 2023. __________________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MTD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?