Thurman-Silva v. Tesla Motors, Inc. et al

Filing 19

ORDER granting nunc pro tunc ECF No. 16 Stipulation : Response to ECF No. Re: 11 Motion to Dismiss due by 4/20/2020. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/15/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Case 3:19-cv-00683-LRH-WGC Document 16 Filed 04/13/20 Page 1 of 3

1 WILLIAM J. GEDDES
Nevada Bar No. 6984

2 KRISTEN R. GEDDES
Nevada Bar No. 9027

3 THE GEDDES LAW FIRM, P.C.
1575 Delucchi Lane, Suite 206

4 Reno, Nevada 89502

Phone: [phone]
5 Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
6 Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Thurman-Silva

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10

ROBERT THURMAN-SILVA, an individual,
Plaintiff,

11
The Geddes Law Firm, P.C.
1575 Delucchi Lane, Suite 206
Reno, NV 89502
Phone [phone]

12

CASE NO: 3:19-cv-683-LRH-WGC

vs.

EMPLOYBRIDGE SOUTHWEST, LLC d/b/a
13 PROLOGISTIX, a Foreign Limited-Liability
Company; THYSSENKRUPP SUPPLY
14 CHAIN SERVICES NA, INC., a Foreign
Corporation; and, TESLA MOTORS, INC., a
15 Foreign Corporation; DOE BUSINESS
ENTITIES 1-10; DOE INDIVIDUALS 1-10.

16

Defendants.

17
18

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR
PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT THYSSENKRUPP
MATERIALS NA, INC.’S MOTION TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
(ECF No. 011)
(First Request)

Plaintiff Robert Thurman-Silva (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants thyssenkrupp Supply Chain

19 Services NA, Inc., thyssenkrupp Materials NA, Inc., and Tesla, Inc.1, by and through their undersigned
20 counsel of record hereby stipulate that Plaintiff may have a one (1)-week extension of time, through
21 and including Monday, April 20, 2020, to file their opposition to Defendant thyssenkrupp Materials
22 NA, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 011). Pursuant to this
23 stipulation, the parties hereby request that the Court grant this enlargement of time. This is the first
24 request for such an extension. The original deadline to file this opposition brief is Monday, April 13,
25 2020, which deadline has not yet run. The reason that Plaintiff needs additional time to file this
26 opposition brief is due to Plaintiff’s counsel’s recent office relocation and related workload.
27
28

1

Defendant Tesla, Inc. is erroneously identified as Tesla Motors, Inc.

1

Case 3:19-cv-00683-LRH-WGC Document 16 Filed 04/13/20 Page 2 of 3

1 This stipulation and request are not made for any dilatory or improper purpose.
2 DATED this 103th day of April, 2020.

THE GEDDES LAW FIRM, P.C.

3
4

Kristen R. Geddes
Nevada Bar No. 9027
1575 Delucchi Lane, Suite 206
Reno, Nevada 89502
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Thurman-Silva

5
6
7
8
9

DATED this 13th day of April, 2020.

10

/s/
________________________________
Antony Martin, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8177
Dana Salmonson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11180
Wells Faro Tower
Suite 1500
3800 Howards Hughes Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorneys for Defendants
thyssenkrupp Materials NA, Inc., thyssenkrupp Supply
Chain Services NA, Inc., and Tesla, Inc.

11
12
The Geddes Law Firm, P.C.
1575 Delucchi Lane, Suite 206
Reno, NV 89502
Phone [phone]

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

13
14
15
16
17
18

ORDER

19
20 IT IS SO ORDERED, nunc pro tunc.
Dated:

IT IS SO ORDERED

21 DATED this 15th day of April, 2020.
22
23

UNITED STATES
LARRY R. HICKS MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
2