McGuire et al v. Carey et al
Filing
89
ORDER - Defendants' Motion to Seal (ECF No. 86 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants have leave to maintain Exhibit 3 to the opposition to motion to compel (ECF No. 84 ) under seal. In addition, Defendants ha ve leave to redact references to Exhibit 3 and/or the contents of specific information relied upon in the opposition itself. Defendants shall have until Monday, November 23, 2020 to refile a redacted opposition and exhibits, except Exhibit 3, on the public docket. The Court will retain the sealed version of the opposition and Exhibit 3 for its reference in deciding the motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 11/16/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
Case 3:20-cv-00249-RCJ-CLB Document 89 Filed 11/16/20 Page 1 of 1
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
PATRICK MCGUIRE, et al.,
3:20-cv-0249-RCJ-CLB
4
5
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
6
7
ANNE MARIE CAREY, et al.,
Defendants.
8
9
Defendants’ motion to seal (ECF No. 86) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
10
Defendants have leave to maintain Exhibit 3 to the opposition to motion to compel under
11
seal. In addition, defendants have leave to redact references to Exhibit 3 and/or the contents
12
of specific information relied upon in the opposition itself.
13
Therefore, defendants shall have until Monday, November 23, 2020 to refile a
14
redacted opposition and exhibits, except Exhibit 3, on the public docket. The court will retain
15
the sealed version of the opposition and Exhibit 3 for its reference in deciding the motion.
16
November 16, 2020
DATED: __________________.
17
18
19
______________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?