Turkiye Ihracat Kredi Bankasi, A.S., vs Nature's Bakery, LLC

Filing 95

ORDER granting ECF No. 92 Motion to Extend Time : One week extension granted to file Reply re ECF No. 81 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 9/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
Case 3:20-cv-00330-LRH-EJY Document 95 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 6 7 8 TURKIEY IHRACAT KREDI BANKASI, A.S., Plaintiff, v. NATURE’S BAKERY, LLC f/k/a BELLA FOUR BAKERY, INC., 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendant. NATURE’S BAKERY, LLC f/k/a BELLA FOUR BAKERY, INC., 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER Third Party Plaintiff, v. INTRANSIA LLC, Third Party Defendant. INTRANSIA LLC, 16 17 Case No. 3:20-cv-00330-LRH-EJY Counterclaimant, v. NATURE’S BAKERY, LLC f/k/a BELLA FOUR BAKERY, INC., and DOES I-X, inclusive, Counterdefendants. INTRANSIA LLC, Cross Claimant, v. TURKIYE IHRACAT KREDI BANKASI, A.S., and DOES XI-XX, inclusive, Cross Defendants. 27 Pending before the Court is Nature’s Bakery, LLC’s Motion for Extension of Time to File 28 its Reply Brief in Support of the Motion for Sanctions (Second Request). ECF No. 92. In its Motion, 1 Case 3:20-cv-00330-LRH-EJY Document 95 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2 1 Nature’s Bakery recognizes that it is seeking a second one-week extension to file its Reply. Id. at 2. 2 The Motion, however, does not explain what “other professional obligations” Nature’s Bakery’s 3 lead counsel is facing preventing the timely filing of its Reply. Id. at 2-3. Plaintiff filed its Response 4 on September 6. ECF No. 94. Plaintiff argues that Nature’s Bakery’s failure to offer any support 5 for the second requested extension, especially when other counsel for Nature’s Bakery are available 6 to draft the Reply, establishes an insufficient basis to grant the requested extension. 7 The Court recognizes that Nature’s Bakery did not provide information sufficient for Plaintiff 8 to understand and consider the reason for the additional requested extension, which ordinarily should 9 be provided especially when multiple attorneys are involved on behalf of a client, one of whom— 10 not lead counsel—drafted prior pleadings. However, given the very brief extension request, the 11 Court will not deny the request. The Court cautions counsel for all parties, including Nature’s 12 Bakery, that more transparent bases for requested extensions are highly advised. 13 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Nature’s Bakery, LLC’s Motion for Extension 14 of Time to File its Reply Brief in Support of the Motion for Sanctions (Second Request) (ECF No. 15 92) is GRANTED. 16 Dated this 7th day of September, 2021. 17 18 19 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?