Casteel v. Aranas

Filing 78

ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion to Clarify (ECF No. 77 ) is denied. The Court's Order (ECF No. 76 ) is clear on its face and shall remain in full force and effect. Plaintiff may simply review and copy the medical files he was provided and now possesses in his cell. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 6/3/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

SCOTT CASTEEL,

7
8
9
10
11

Case No. 3:20-CV-0381-GMN-CLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
ROMEO ARANAS, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/

12

Plaintiff filed a one-page motion to clarify the court’s order ECF No. 76 together

13

with what appears to be 312 pages of his medical record attached as exhibits. (ECF No.

14

77). The court’s order ECF No. 76 ordered, among other things, Defendants provide

15

copies of Plaintiff’s relevant medical records directly to him at NDOC’s expense and allow

16

him to possess those records in his cell. Plaintiff now complains he thought the order

17

was for him to review his medical file and copy the documents he wanted. (ECF No. 77).

18

Plaintiff’s motion to clarify (ECF No. 77) is DENIED. The court’s order ECF No. 76

19

is clear on its face and shall remain in full force and effect. Plaintiff may simply review

20

and copy the medical files he was provided and now possesses in his cell.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22

June 3, 2021
DATED: _____________________

23
24
25
26
27
28

____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE