Casteel v. Aranas
ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion to Clarify (ECF No. 77 ) is denied. The Court's Order (ECF No. 76 ) is clear on its face and shall remain in full force and effect. Plaintiff may simply review and copy the medical files he was provided and now possesses in his cell. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 6/3/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case No. 3:20-CV-0381-GMN-CLB
ROMEO ARANAS, et al.,
Plaintiff filed a one-page motion to clarify the court’s order ECF No. 76 together
with what appears to be 312 pages of his medical record attached as exhibits. (ECF No.
77). The court’s order ECF No. 76 ordered, among other things, Defendants provide
copies of Plaintiff’s relevant medical records directly to him at NDOC’s expense and allow
him to possess those records in his cell. Plaintiff now complains he thought the order
was for him to review his medical file and copy the documents he wanted. (ECF No. 77).
Plaintiff’s motion to clarify (ECF No. 77) is DENIED. The court’s order ECF No. 76
is clear on its face and shall remain in full force and effect. Plaintiff may simply review
and copy the medical files he was provided and now possesses in his cell.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 3, 2021
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?