Harvill v. TM&KKH, Inc. dba Michael Hohl Honda
Filing
27
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - The Stipulation of Dismissal (ECF No. 26 ) is granted. This matter is dismissed with prejudice; each side to bear their own costs and fees. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
Case 3:20-cv-00458-RCJ-CLB Document 27 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
JANET C. PANCOAST, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 005090
CISNEROS & MARIAS
6671 S. Las Vegas Boulevard
Building D, Suite 215
Las Vegas, NV 89119
MAIL TO
1299 Zurich Way, Suite 250
Schaumburg, IL 60196
(702) 233-9660 (telephone)
(702) 233-9665 (facsimile)
janet.pancoast@zurichna.com
Attorneys for Defendant
TM&KKH, INC.
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
EMILY HARVILL,
CASE NO:
3:20-cv-00458
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
TM&KKH, INC., dba
MICHAEL HOHL HONDA,
16
Defendant.
17
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the PLAINTIFF, EMILY
19
20
HARVILL and her counsel MARK MAUSERT, ESQ. of LAW OFFICE OF MARK MAUSERT
21
and DEFENDANT TM&KKH, INC. by and through their counsel of record JANET C.
22
PANCOAST, ESQ. of CISNEROS & MARIAS, hereby to dismiss this case with prejudice.
23
///
24
25
///
///
26
27
28
1
Case 3:20-cv-00458-RCJ-CLB Document 27 Filed 01/07/21 Page 2 of 3
Emily Harvill vs. Michael Hohl Honda
34B-2020-00174
Stipulation & Order for Dismissal with Prejudice
1
2
3
It is further agreed that each side to bear their own costs and fees.
4
There is no Trial presently scheduled for this case.
5
Dated this 7th day of December, 2020.
Dated this 7th day of Decmeber, 2020.
6
CISNEROS & MARIAS
LAW OFFICE OF MARK MAUSERT
7
8
9
10
11
/s/ Mark Mausert
____________________________
JANET C. PANCOAST, ESQ.
6671 S. Las Vegas Blvd.
Building D, Suite 215
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Attorneys for Defendant
______________________________
MARK MAUSERT, ESQ.
930 Evans Avenue
Reno, NV 89512
Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
ORDER
13
14
15
16
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter be dismissed with prejudice; each side to bear
their own costs and fees.
Dated this 7th day of January, 2021
17
____________________________
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
18
19
Submitted by:
20
CISNEROS & MARIAS
21
22
23
24
25
_____________________________
JANET C. PANCOAST, ESQ.
6671 S. Las Vegas Blvd.
Building D, Suite 215
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Attorneys for Defendant
26
27
28
2
Case 3:20-cv-00458-RCJ-CLB Document 26 Filed 01/06/21 Page 3 of 3
27
01/07/21
Janet Pancoast
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Brittaney Martin
Monday, December 7, 2020 9:55 AM
Janet Pancoast
[EXTERNAL] RE: Harvill vs. TM&KKH - Stipulation for Dismissal
Hi JanetThe stipulation looks good. You may affix Mark’s e-signature for filing with the court.
From: Janet Pancoast
Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 12:49 PM
To: Mark Mausert
Cc: Brittaney Martin
Subject: Harvill vs. TM&KKH - Stipulation for Dismissal
Please find attached the Stipulation for Dismissal. I have ordered the checks. If you will sign this and send it
back to me I would appreciate it. Normally, I require this before I order the check, but did not want any delay. Once I
confirm you received the checks, I will then sign the dismissal and submit it to the Court.
If you want any revisions, please advise.
Janet C. Pancoast, Esq.
O: 702.562.7616
C: 702.325.7876
******************* PLEASE NOTE *******************
This message, along with any attachments, is for the designated recipient(s) only and may contain privileged,
proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If this message has reached you in error, kindly destroy it without
review and notify the sender immediately. Any other use of such misdirected e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed
by local law, electronic communications with Zurich and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including
content), may be scanned for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with company
policy.
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?