D'Agostino v. Naughton et al

Filing 14

ORDERED that the Court dismisses this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). Clerk of the Court will close the case and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/28/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 FRANK D'AGOSTINO, Case No. 3:20-cv-00480-RCJ-WGC 4 Plaintiff, 5 6 ORDER v. NAUGHTON, et al., 7 Defendants. 8 9 I. DISCUSSION 10 On January 14, 2021, following Defendants' filing of a suggestion of death on the 11 record stating that Plaintiff Frank D'Agostino (#32883) had passed away on January 3, 12 2021, the Court issued an order allowing a 90-day period from the date of the order for a 13 motion for substitution to be filed by any party or by the decedent’s successor or 14 representative. (ECF No. 13). 15 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1), “[i]f a party dies and the claim 16 is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party. A motion for 17 substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent’s successor or representative. 18 If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the 19 action by or against the decedent must be dismissed.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). The 90-day period has passed and there has been no motion for substitution. As 20 21 such, the Court dismisses the case. 22 II. 23 24 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the Court dismisses this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will close the case and enter judgment accordingly. DATED THIS ____ day of April 2021. 28th _________ ROBERT C. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?