SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2016 SC6 Title Trust, First American Trustee Servicing Solutions, LLC

Filing 46

ORDER - This case will now be closed administratively pending ruling by Nevada Supreme Court re U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Thunder Properties, Inc., No. 17-16399. Said closing has no substantive effect on the status of the case. The case remains pending for all substantive purposes. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/4/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 6/4/2021 for font (DRM).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.

***

Case No. 3:20-cv-00604-LRH-WGC
MINUTE ORDER
June 4, 2021

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE FOR
TRUMAN 2016 SC6 TITLE TRUST
AND FIRST AMERICAN TRUSTEE
SERVICING SOLUTIONS, LLC,
Defendant.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE LARRY R. HICKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:

NONE APPEARING

REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S):

NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S):

NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
On June 3, 2021, the court granted the parties' stipulation to stay litigation in this
matter (see Order ECF No. 45). It appearing that there is no purpose in requiring status
reports or other filings from counsel until the Nevada Supreme Court rules upon U.S. Bank,
N.A. v. Thunder Properties, Inc., No. 17-16399, or upon the occurrence of any other
development, and good cause appearing,
For the convenience of the parties and the court’s administrative purposes, this case
will now be closed administratively; said closing has no substantive effect on the status of
the case. The case remains pending for all substantive purposes. The case will be
reopened administratively when any of the parties request reopening or notify the court of
the Nevada Supreme Court's ruling. Within forty-five (45) days of a decision in Thunder
Properties, the parties shall file an updated joint status report informing the court how they
wish to proceed, including the setting of new discovery deadlines. Given this minute order,
the court will not consider the parties' joint motion to extend discovery deadlines (ECF No.
44) at this time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
By:

/s/
Deputy Clerk