Singh v. Singh et al

Filing 13

ORDER granting ECF No. 12 Stipulation : Response to ECF No. 11 Motion to Dismiss due by 5/21/2021. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 4/27/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Case 3:21-cv-00094-HDM-WGC Document 12 Filed 04/27/21 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

Mark Mausert
NV Bar No. 2398
729 Evans Avenue
Reno, NV 89512
[phone]
Fax [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9

HARPREET SINGH,

10

Plaintiff,

11

vs.

12

ROOP SINGH & DHALIWAL, INC.

13

Case No. 3:21-cv-00094-HDM-WGC
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request)

Defendants.

14

Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, Plaintiff HARPREET SINGH, and Defendants ROOP

15

SINGH & DHALIWAL, INC., by and through their undersigned counsels of record, hereby
16
17

stipulate and respectfully request an Order granting the Stipulation to extend the deadline for

18

Plaintiff to file an opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) from April 30,

19

2021 to May 21, 2021.

20

//

21

//
22
23

//

24
25
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS

Case 3:21-cv-00094-HDM-WGC Document 12 Filed 04/27/21 Page 2 of 2

The parties request this extension due to counsel for Plaintiff’s busy schedule and

1
2

requires the additional time to prepare a proper response. This request is not for any improper

3

delay.
4
5
6

Dated: April 27, 2021

Dated: April 27, 2021

LAW OFFICE OF MARK MAUSERT

DOLAN LAW, LLC

/s/ Mark Mausert
MARK MAUSERT
Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Robert Dolan
ROBERT E. DOLAN, ESQ.

7
8
9

Attorney for Defendants

10
11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15
16
17

DATED this 27th day of ______________, 2021.
____
April

__________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS