Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al

Filing 4

ORDER - Judge Cobb's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. #3 ) is accepted and adopted in full. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #1 ) is GRANTED. NDOC shall pay Clerk $350 filing fee from inmate account. Clerk shall SEND a copy of this order to Finance and to NDOC Inmate Services (Email (NEF) to Finance; copy mailed to NDOC on 4/28/2021). Clerk is directed to file the Complaint (ECF No. #1 -1). Counts are dismissed as specified herein. Any amended complaint is due within 30 days from the date of entry of this order. Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff the approved 1983 Complaint form and instructions for the same (mailed to Plaintiff at Lakes Crossing on 4/28/2021). If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies outlined in this order, this action will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/28/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6
7
8
9
10

INFINITE MASTER MAGNETIC,
JESSE JERMONE POINTER,

aka

Case No. 3:21-cv-00122-MMD-WGC
ORDER

Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
Defendants.

11
12

Pro se Plaintiff Infinite Master Magnetic aka Jesse Jerome Pointer, who is currently

13

in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections (“NDOC”) filed this complaint

14

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on March

15

11, 2021. (ECF Nos. 1, 1-1.) Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”

16

or “Recommendation”) of United States Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (ECF No. 3),

17

screening Plaintiff’s Complaint. Judge Cobb recommends the Court grant Plaintiff’s IFP

18

application and dismiss his claims, some with prejudice and some with leave to amend.

19

Plaintiff had until April 19, 2021 to file an objection. To date, no objection to the R&R has

20

been filed. For this reason, and as explained below, the Court adopts the R&R, grants

21

Plaintiff’s IFP application, and will dismiss Plaintiff’s claims either with prejudice or with

22

leave to amend, as specified herein.

23

The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

24

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party

25

fails to object to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the Court is not required to

26

conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas

27

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,

28

1116 (9th Cir. 2003) (“De novo review of the magistrate judges’ findings and

1

recommendations is required if, but only if, one or both parties file objections to the

2

findings and recommendations.”) (emphasis in original); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, Advisory

3

Committee Notes (1983) (providing that the Court “need only satisfy itself that there is no

4

clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”).

5

Because there is no objection, the Court need not conduct de novo review, and is

6

satisfied Judge Cobb did not clearly err. Here, Plaintiff asserts claims against a laundry

7

list of defendants, including the State of Nevada, Officer Brit, Officers John Doe, the Metro

8

Police Department (“LVMPD”), Clark County Detention, Judge Linda Bell, Officer Neaul,

9

the Public Defender’s Office, Lake’s Crossing Center, and Dr. Colepepper.

10

First, Judge Cobb found that

Plaintiff’s account statement sufficiently

11

demonstrated he could not pay the filing fee. (ECF No. 3 at 2-3.) Judge Cobb

12

recommends granting Plaintiff’s IFP application.

13

Judge Cobb then recommends dismissing the State of Nevada and Lake’s

14

Crossing Center with prejudice and without leave to amend because they are not

15

“persons” for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and, therefore, Plaintiff cannot assert claims

16

against them. (Id. at 5-6). Judge Cobb further recommends dismissing Judge Linda Bell

17

with prejudice and without leave to amend because she is entitled to absolute immunity

18

for acts performed in her official capacity. (Id. at 6.)

19

Judge Cobb also recommends the Court dismiss Clark County Detention Center

20

because it is not an entity that can sue or be sued. (Id. at 9.) However, because Plaintiff

21

could potentially maintain a claim against Clark County and LVMPD, Judge Cobb

22

recommends dismissing Plaintiff’s claims against LVMPD without prejudice and

23

permitting him to amend his complaint to include a theory of municipal liability against

24

either Clark County, LVMPD, or both. (Id. at 9-10.)

25

Judge Cobb construes Plaintiff’s allegations that he was beaten and robbed by

26

unidentified officers as a potential attempt to assert an excessive force claim against

27

Officer Neaul, Officer Brit, and/or potential John/Jane Doe officers. (Id. at 7-8.) Likewise,

28

Judge Cobb construes Plaintiff’s allegation that his property was taken during an arrest
2

1

as a potential due process claim. (Id. at 8-9.) Judge Cobb recommends dismissing both

2

the excessive force and due process claims because they are not sufficiently specific or

3

clear, but also recommends that Plaintiff should be granted leave to amend.

4

Judge Cobb construes Plaintiff’s claims that Dr. Colepepper forcibly gave him

5

injections against his religious belief and extreme objection as potentially stating a First

6

Amendment free exercise claim. (Id. at 10-13.) However, like Plaintiff’s excessive force

7

and due process property claims, his claim against Dr. Colepepper is not sufficiently clear.

8

Judge Cobb therefore recommends dismissing the claims against Dr. Colepepper without

9

prejudice and with leave to amend.

10

Finally, Judge Cobb construes Plaintiff’s claim that he was beaten while in lock up

11

and was not administered any medical care as a Fourteenth Amendment denial of

12

adequate medical care. (Id. at 14.) As with the other claims in the Complaint, Judge Cobb

13

found that Plaintiff does not allege sufficient facts to sustain the claim as it is currently

14

pleaded. Judge Cobb therefore recommends dismissing the denial of adequate medical

15

care without prejudice and with leave to amend.

16
17
18
19

The Court agrees with Judge Cobb. Having reviewed the R&R and the record in
this case, the Court will adopt the R&R in full.
It is therefore ordered that Judge Cobb’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.
3) is accepted and adopted in full.

20

It is further ordered that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF

21

No. 1) without having to prepay the full filing fee is granted. Plaintiff will not be required to

22

pay an initial installment fee. Nevertheless, the full filing fee will still be due, pursuant to

23

28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended by the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act. The movant herein

24

is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without the necessity of prepayment of

25

fees or costs or the giving of security therefor. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), the

26

Nevada Department of Corrections will pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court,

27

District of Nevada, 20% of the preceding month’s deposits to Plaintiff’s account (Jesse

28

Jerome Pointer, #1590932), in the months that the account exceeds $10.00, until the full
3

1

$350.00 filing fee has been paid for this action. The Clerk of the Court will send a copy of

2

this order to the Finance Division of the Clerk’s Office. The Clerk of the Court will also

3

send a copy of this order to the attention of the Chief of Inmate Services for the Nevada

4

Department of Corrections, P.O. Box 7011, Carson City, NV 89702.

5

It is further ordered that, regardless of the success of Plaintiff’s action, the full filing

6

fee will still be due, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915, as amended by the Prisoner Litigation

7

Reform Act.

8

The Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1).

9

It is further ordered that Plaintiff’s claims against the State of Nevada and Lake’s

10

Crossing Center are dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend.
It is further ordered that Plaintiff’s claims against Judge Linda Bell are dismissed

11
12

with prejudice and without leave to amend.

13

It is further ordered that Plaintiff’s claims against Clark County Detention Center

14

are dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend. However, Plaintiff is granted

15

leave to amend to assert a claim based on a municipal theory of liability against Clark

16

County.
It is further ordered that Plaintiff’s claims against Las Vegas Metropolitan Police

17
18

Department are dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend.
It is further ordered that Plaintiff’s claims against Dr. Colepepper are dismissed

19
20

without prejudice, with leave to amend.

21

It is further ordered that Plaintiff’s excessive force and property claims against

22

Officers Neaul and Brit, and potential John or Jane Doe Officers, are dismissed without

23

prejudice, with leave to amend.
It is further ordered that Plaintiff’s First Amendment claims are dismissed without

24
25

prejudice, with leave to amend.
It is further ordered that Plaintiff’s denial of adequate medical care claims are

26
27

dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend.

28

///
4

1

It is further ordered that, if Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint curing

2

the deficient of his complaint, as outlined in this order, he must file the amended complaint

3

within 30 days from the date of entry of this order.

4

The Clerk of Court is further directed to send Plaintiff the approved form for filing

5

a § 1983 complaint and instructions for the same. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended

6

complaint, he should use the approved form and he will write the words “First Amended”

7

above the words “Civil Rights Complaint” in the caption.

8
9
10

It is further ordered that, if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint curing the
deficiencies outlined in this order, this action will be dismissed with prejudice.
DATED THIS 28th Day of April 2021.

11
12
13
14

MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5