Sepulveda v. Social Security Administration
Filing
22
ORDER GRANTING ECF No. 21 Motion to Extend Time : Opening brief due by Monday, 11/14/2022. No further extensions of time will be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 9/14/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Case 3:21-cv-00332-CLB Document 22 Filed 09/14/22 Page 1 of 1
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
Plaintiff,
5
6
7
8
v.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
EXTEND TIME
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,
[ECF No. 21]
Defendant.
9
10
Case No. 3:21-cv-00332-CLB
ELIZABETH SEPULVEDA,
On August 2, 2021, Plaintiff Elizabeth Sepulveda (“Sepulveda”) initiated this action,
which involves judicial review of an administrative action by the Secretary of Health and
Human Services, denying her claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act.
(ECF No. 1.) On December 22, 2021, this Court ordered Sepulveda to file an opening brief
on or before January 21, 2022, (ECF No. 17), which she did not do. Thus, the Court issued
a subsequent notice that Sepulveda should file her opening brief by September 19, 2022,
or her case would be dismissed. (ECF No. 18.) Currently pending before the Court is a
letter—which the Court construes as a motion—filed by Sepulveda requesting a 60-day
extension of time to submit her opening brief. (ECF No. 21.)
For good cause appearing, the motion, (ECF No. 21), is GRANTED. Sepulveda
shall submit an opening brief on or before Monday, November 14, 2022. No further
extensions of time will be granted. Sepulveda is again cautioned that the failure to file an
opening brief on or before Monday, November 14, 2022, will result in this action being
dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and LR 41-1.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 14, 2022
DATED: ________________
______________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?