Sepulveda v. Social Security Administration

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING ECF No. 21 Motion to Extend Time : Opening brief due by Monday, 11/14/2022. No further extensions of time will be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 9/14/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
Case 3:21-cv-00332-CLB Document 22 Filed 09/14/22 Page 1 of 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 Plaintiff, 5 6 7 8 v. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, [ECF No. 21] Defendant. 9 10 Case No. 3:21-cv-00332-CLB ELIZABETH SEPULVEDA, On August 2, 2021, Plaintiff Elizabeth Sepulveda (“Sepulveda”) initiated this action, which involves judicial review of an administrative action by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, denying her claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1.) On December 22, 2021, this Court ordered Sepulveda to file an opening brief on or before January 21, 2022, (ECF No. 17), which she did not do. Thus, the Court issued a subsequent notice that Sepulveda should file her opening brief by September 19, 2022, or her case would be dismissed. (ECF No. 18.) Currently pending before the Court is a letter—which the Court construes as a motion—filed by Sepulveda requesting a 60-day extension of time to submit her opening brief. (ECF No. 21.) For good cause appearing, the motion, (ECF No. 21), is GRANTED. Sepulveda shall submit an opening brief on or before Monday, November 14, 2022. No further extensions of time will be granted. Sepulveda is again cautioned that the failure to file an opening brief on or before Monday, November 14, 2022, will result in this action being dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and LR 41-1. IT IS SO ORDERED. September 14, 2022 DATED: ________________ ______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?