Sanchez v. Saucedo et al
Filing
47
ORDER - It is ordered that Judge Baldwin's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 35 ) is accepted and adopted in full. It is further ordered that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 3/26/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - GA)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
JASMINE PAUL SANCHEZ,
v.
Case No. 3:22-cv-00141-ART-CLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 35)
AND GRANTING MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 28)
R. SAUCEDO, et al.,
Defendants.
10
11
Pro se Plaintiff Jasmine Paul Sanchez, an inmate at Ely State Prison,
12
brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants, William Reubart
13
and Ricardo Saucedo, alleging excessive force and unsafe prison conditions.
14
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States
15
Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin (ECF No. 35), recommending the Court grant
16
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Mr. Sanchez originally had until
17
August 29, 2023, to file an objection to Judge Baldwin’s R&R and was given
18
several months’ worth of extensions. (See ECF Nos. 35 at 11; 37; 44.) As of today,
19
no objection has been filed. For this reason, and as explained below, the Court
20
adopts the R&R and grants Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
21
The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings
22
or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where
23
a party fails to object to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the Court is not
24
required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of
25
an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); see also United States v.
26
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1116 (9th Cir. 2003) (“De novo review of the
27
magistrate judges’ findings and recommendations is required if, but only if, one
28
or both parties file objections to the findings and recommendations.”) (emphasis
1
1
in original); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, Advisory Committee Notes (1983) (providing that
2
the Court “need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the
3
record in order to accept the recommendation.”).
4
Because there is no objection, the Court need not conduct de novo review
5
and is satisfied Judge Baldwin did not clearly err. Judge Baldwin recommends
6
summary judgment in favor of Defendants because there is no genuine issue of
7
material fact as to whether Mr. Sanchez was subject to excessive force or unsafe
8
prison conditions. Mr. Sanchez has provided the Court with no evidence to
9
support his claims, has not contested Defendants’ motion, and has not objected
10
to Judge Baldwin’s R&R. Further, the evidence provided by Defendants
11
demonstrates that the instances of which Mr. Sanchez complains do not
12
constitute excessive force or unsafe prison conditions, as a matter of law.
Having reviewed the R&R and the record in this case, the Court is satisfied
13
14
that Judge Baldwin did not clearly err and adopts the R&R in full.
It is therefore ordered that Judge Baldwin’s Report and Recommendation
15
16
(ECF No. 35) is accepted and adopted in full.
It is further ordered that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
17
18
No. 28) is granted.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this
19
20
case.
21
22
Dated this 26th day of March 2024.
23
24
25
26
ANNE R. TRAUM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?