Friends of Animals v. Haaland et al

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING CASE SCHEDULE OUTLINED IN ECF No. 19 Joint Case Management Report -Administrative Record: Administrative Record due 12/16/2022 as detailed herein. Parties shall consult about any concerns and attempt to inform ally resolve any disputes no later than 1/17/2023. If parties cannot resolve disputes, Plaintiff will file a motion to complete and/or supplement the administrative record by 2/15/2023. Defendants' opposition will be due by 3/15 /2023. Plaintiff's reply will be due by 3/29/2023.If Plaintiff files a motion to complete and/or supplement the administrative record, the summary judgment schedule outlined below will be vacated. The Parties will submit a new, mut ually agreeable summary judgment schedule within 7 days of the Court's decision on Plaintiff's record motion.Motions for Summary Judgment: If there are no administrative record disputes, Plaintiff shall file its Motion for Summary Judgment no later than 2/23/2023. Defendants shall file their combined Respons and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgement no later than 3/23/2023. plaintiff shall file its combined Response to Defendant's Cross-Motion and Rely in support of its Motion no later than 4/13/2023. Defendants shall file its Reply in support of its Cross-Motion no later than 5/4/2023.Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 11/21/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)

Case 3:22-cv-00365-ART-CLB Document 21 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, a non-profit
corporation,

Case No. 3:22-cv-00365-ART-CLB

Plaintiff,
v.
DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as
Secretary of the Interior; and
THE UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND
MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States
Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING CASE SCHEDULE
OUTLINED IN
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT

Case 3:22-cv-00365-ART-CLB Document 21 Filed 11/21/22 Page 2 of 7

1

Plaintiff Friends of Animals (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Deb Haaland, in her official

2

capacity as Secretary of the Interior, and the United States Bureau of Land Management

3

(BLM) (“Defendants”), (collectively, the “Parties”), file this Joint Case Management Report

4

for the above-captioned case pursuant to the Court’s Order dated October 18, 2022 (ECF

5

No. 18). The parties have conferred and agree that this is a case for review on the

6

administrative record and is therefore exempt from the requirements of Federal Rule of

7

Civil Procedure 26. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B)(i); D. Nev. Civ. R. 16-1(c)(1).

8
9

1. Nature of the case
BLM manages 245 million acres of public lands in the United States including about

10

26.9 million acres managed as wild horse and burro habitat. BLM periodically rounds up

11

and removes wild horses and burros (“WHB”) from public lands. After a gather BLM

12

transfers the wild horses and burros to off-range corrals (ORCs), which were previously

13

known as short-term holding facilities. Wild horses and burros are held at ORCs until they

14

are adopted, sold, die, or there is availability at off-range pastures (ORPs), which were

15

previously known as long-term holding facilities.

16

On October 30, 2020, BLM issued a solicitation seeking contractors to provide ORC

17

space on private land in Nevada and two other states. On August 3, 2021, BLM sent an

18

official apparent awardee letter to JS Livestock Inc. stating that BLM anticipated awarding a

19

contract to JS Livestock for the processing, feeding, and care of up to 4,000 excess wild

20

horses and burros on 100 acres of private land owned by JS Livestock near Winnemucca,

21

Nevada (the “Winnemucca ORC”). On September 2, 2021, BLM released a Preliminary

22

Environmental Assessment (EA) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

23

and solicited public comments on the Proposed Action for the BLM to fund a contract with

24

JS Livestock for the Winnemucca ORC.

25
26
27
1

Case 3:22-cv-00365-ART-CLB Document 21 Filed 11/21/22 Page 3 of 7

1

On November 3, 2021, BLM released a Final EA, a Finding of No Significant Impact

2

(FONSI), and a Decision Record concluding that the construction, maintenance and

3

operation of the Winnemucca ORC would not significantly impact the human environment

4

and that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under NEPA was not necessary.

5

On August 18, 2022, Friends of Animals filed a complaint against Defendants

6

claiming that BLM’s decision to fund and continuously operate the Winnemucca ORC

7

violated NEPA 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321, et seq., the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act

8

(WHBA) 16 U.S.C. §§ 1331 et seq., and was arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion,

9

and not in accordance with law or required procedure, in violation APA the

10

Administrative Procedure Act (APA) 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-06. Friends of Animals claims that the

11

decision to award the Winnemucca ORC contract violates NEPA, the APA, and the WHBA.

12

Defendants dispute Plaintiff’s claims and maintain that the decision to award the

13

Winnemucca ORC contract, and its accompanying environmental review, are lawful,

14

reasonable, and supported by the record. Defendants deny that Plaintiff is entitled to any

15

relief whatsoever.

16

2. Jurisdiction

17

This Court has federal question subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331

18

because this action presents a case and controversy arising under the WHBA, 16 U.S.C. §§

19

1331 et seq. and NEPA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321, et seq. which are federal statutes. This Court also

20

has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1346, as the United States is a defendant. This Court

21

has authority to grant Plaintiff’s requested relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202

22

(declaratory and injunctive relief) and 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706 (Administrative Procedure Act).

23

Venue properly lies in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e) and 16 U.S.C. §

24

1540(g)(3)(A). The events giving rise to the cause of action occurred in this judicial district

25

and Defendant, BLM, maintains an office in this judicial district.

26
27
2

Case 3:22-cv-00365-ART-CLB Document 21 Filed 11/21/22 Page 4 of 7

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

3. Additional parties and amended pleading
The Parties do not expect to add additional parties to the case or otherwise amend
pleadings.
4. Pending motions
There are no pending motions in this case.
5. Related cases
There are no related cases to this case.
6. Discovery
The Parties agree that this case arises under the APA, which will involve resolution

10

of Plaintiff’s claims through judicial review of the administrative record and applicable

11

federal statutes and regulations. See 5 U.S.C. § 706; Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138, 142 (1973);

12

Ctr. For Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 450 F.3d 930, 934 n.4 (9th Cir. 2006).

13

Extra-record evidence, including the taking of discovery, is allowed only through limited

14

exceptions and the parties are not obligated to follow the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

15

26 discovery process. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B)(i); D. Nev. Civ. R. 16-1(c)(1). The

16

Parties have conferred, and neither the Plaintiff nor Federal Defendants intend at this time

17

to seek discovery; in the event that any Party decides to alter from this plan and seek

18

discovery, the Parties acknowledge that leave of the Court would be required.

19
20

7. ESI
This section is inapplicable to this case because this is a case for review on the

21

administrative record.

22

8. Scheduling

23

The Court ordered the parties to file a Joint Case Management Report by Friday,

24

November 18, 2022. See ECF No. 18. As discussed above, this case arises under the APA and

25

neither party intends to seek discovery at this time. The parties have conferred and agree

26

that the case could be resolved with motions for summary judgment. The parties

27
3

Case 3:22-cv-00365-ART-CLB Document 21 Filed 11/21/22 Page 5 of 7

11

respectfully request the Court enter an order approving the following schedule for

22

producing the administrative record and briefing motions for summary judgment:

33

Administrative Record

44



55
66

Defendants shall file the certified administrative record with the Court and serve a
copy of the administrative record upon Plaintiff no later than December 16, 2022.



The parties shall consult about any concerns with the administrative record and

77

attempt to informally resolve any disputes regarding the administrative record no

88

later than January 17, 2023.

99



If the parties cannot resolve disputes regarding the administrative record

10
10

informally, Plaintiff will file a motion to complete and/or supplement the

11
11

administrative record by February 15, 2023.

12
12

o Defendants’ opposition to Plaintiff’s record motion will be due by March 15,

13
13

2023.

14
14
15
15

o Plaintiff’s reply will be due by March 29, 2023.


If Plaintiff files a motion to complete and/or supplement the administrative record,

16
16

the summary judgment schedule outlined below will be vacated. The Parties will

17
17

submit a new, mutually agreeable summary judgment schedule within 7 days of the

18
18

Court’s decision on Plaintiff’s record motion.

19
19
20
20

Motions for Summary Judgment


21
21

If there are no administrative record disputes, the parties agree to the following
schedule for briefing motions for summary judgment:

22
22



Plaintiff shall file its Motion for Summary Judgment no later than February 23, 2023.

23
23



Defendants shall file their combined Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

24
24
25
25
26
26

Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment no later than March 23, 2023.


Plaintiff shall file its combined Response to Federal Defendants’ Cross-Motion and
Reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment no later than April 13, 2023.

27
27
4

Case 3:22-cv-00365-ART-CLB Document 21 Filed 11/21/22 Page 6 of 7

1
2
3
4



Defendants shall file its Reply in support of its Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
no later than May 4, 2023.

9. Jury Trial
This section is inapplicable to this case because this is a case for review on the

5

administrative record.

6

10. Settlement

7
8
9
10
11
12

At this time, the parties do not believe the dispute can be resolved through
settlement.
11. Magistrate
The parties do not consent to proceed before the magistrate judge.
12. Expedited briefing
The parties believe this case can be resolved on motions for summary judgment and

13

agreed to the briefing schedule listed above.

14

13. Case management conference.

15

The parties do not request that a case management conference be set in this case.

16
17

Dated: November 18, 2022

Respectfully submitted,

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

s/Andreia E. Marcuccio___________

TODD KIM
Assistant Attorney General
Environment & Natural Resources Division
S. JAY GOVINDAN, Acting Section Chief
Wildlife & Marine Resources Section

Andreia E. Marcuccio (pro hac vice)
Friends of Animals, Wildlife Law Program
7500 E. Arapahoe Road, Suite 385
Centennial, CO 80112
Telephone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
[e-mail]

s/ Mark A. Pacella_________
MARK A. PACELLA (DC Bar # 470485)
Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
Environment & Natural Resources Division
Natural Resources Section
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, DC 20044-7611
Telephone: [phone]

Attorney for Plaintiff

26
27
5

Case 3:22-cv-00365-ART-CLB Document 21 Filed 11/21/22 Page 7 of 7

Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

1
2

RICKEY TURNER (CO Bar # 38353)
Senior Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
Environment & Natural Resources Division
Wildlife & Marine Resources Section
999 18th St., South Terrace, Suite 370
Denver, CO 80202
Ph: 303-844-1373
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

JASON M. FRIERSON
United States Attorney
District of Nevada
Nevada Bar Number 7709
HOLLY A. VANCE
Assistant United States Attorney
400 South Virginia Street, Suite 900
Reno, NV 89501
Tel: [phone]
[e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14
15

Counsel for Federal Defendants

16
17
18
19
20
21

case.

Having reviewed the above, the Court adopts the schedule outlined herein for the this

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 21st day of November, 2022.
_____________________________________________
United States Magistrate Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
6