Crapps et al v. Carson City, Nevada

Filing 6

ORDER granting ECF No. 4 Stipulation : Answer/response to Complaint (ECF No. 1 ) due by 10/13/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 9/14/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
Case 3:22-cv-00379-ART-CSD Document 6 Filed 09/14/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CARSON CITY DISTRICT ATTORNEY Jason D. Woodbury, Esq. NV Bar No. 6870 Adam Tully, Esq. NV Bar No. 13601 885 East Musser Street, Suite 2030 Carson City, NV 89701 T: (775) 887-2070 F: (775) 887-2129 jwoodbury@carson.org atully@carson.org Attorneys for Defendant Carson City 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 MASTON CRAPPS and KATHERINE CARTER, Plaintiffs, v. CARSON CITY, NEVADA, a consolidated municipality and political subdivision of the State of Nevada; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Case No. 3:22-cv-00379-ART-CSD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CARSON CITY TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT [ECF No. 1] (First Request) Defendants. 17 18 Defendant Carson City, Nevada (“City”), by and through its counsel, Jason D. 19 Woodbury, Caron City District Attorney, and Adam Tully, Deputy District Attorney, and 20 Plaintiffs Matson Crapps and Katherine Carter, by and through their counsel, Mark 21 Forsberg, Esq. and Oshinski & Forsberg, Ltd., respectfully submit this Stipulation to Extend 22 Time for Defendant Carson City to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint [ECF No. 1] 23 (“Stipulation”). This Stipulation is made in accordance with LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 24 7-1. This is the first request to extend the deadline for the City to file a response to Plaintiffs’ 25 Case 3:22-cv-00379-ART-CSD Document 6 Filed 09/14/22 Page 2 of 2 1 Complaint [ECF No. 1], served on August 29, 2022, from September 19, 2022, to October 2 13, 2022. 3 The power to control litigation to which the City is a party ultimately rests with the 4 City’s elected Board of Supervisors (“Board”). See NRS 244.165; see also NRS 0.0305, 5 0.033. City’s counsel does not anticipate having the opportunity to consult with the Board 6 on this matter until the Board’s October 6, 2022, meeting. Therefore, the City has requested, 7 and Plaintiffs have consented to, an extension allowing the City to file its response to 8 Plaintiffs’ Complaint on or before October 13, 2022. 9 THEREFORE, upon agreement of the parties, through their respective counsel, the 10 undersigned respectfully request that this Court grant an extension of time permitting the 11 City to file its response to Plaintiffs’ Complaint [ECF No. 1] on or before October 13, 2022. 12 13 14 15 16 17 DATED this 14th day of September, 2022. CARSON CITY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OSHINSKI & FORSBERG, LTD. By: /s/ Adam Tully, Esq. Jason D. Woodbury, Esq. NV Bar No. 6870 Adam Tully, Esq. NV Bar No. 13601 Attorneys for Defendant Carson City By: /s/ Mark Forsberg, Esq. Mark Forsberg, Esq. NV Bar No. 4265 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18 19 20 21 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED 22 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 DATED: 24 25 -2- September 14, 2022 ________________

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?