Crapps et al v. Carson City, Nevada

Filing 6

ORDER granting ECF No. #4 Stipulation : Answer/response to Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) due by 10/13/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 9/14/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Case 3:22-cv-00379-ART-CSD Document 6 Filed 09/14/22 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

CARSON CITY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Jason D. Woodbury, Esq.
NV Bar No. 6870
Adam Tully, Esq.
NV Bar No. 13601
885 East Musser Street, Suite 2030
Carson City, NV 89701
T: [phone]
F: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant Carson City

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

MASTON CRAPPS and KATHERINE
CARTER,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CARSON CITY, NEVADA, a consolidated
municipality and political subdivision of the
State of Nevada; and DOES 1-100, inclusive,

Case No. 3:22-cv-00379-ART-CSD

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANT CARSON CITY
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’
COMPLAINT [ECF No. 1]
(First Request)

Defendants.

17
18

Defendant Carson City, Nevada (“City”), by and through its counsel, Jason D.

19

Woodbury, Caron City District Attorney, and Adam Tully, Deputy District Attorney, and

20

Plaintiffs Matson Crapps and Katherine Carter, by and through their counsel, Mark

21

Forsberg, Esq. and Oshinski & Forsberg, Ltd., respectfully submit this Stipulation to Extend

22

Time for Defendant Carson City to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint [ECF No. 1]

23

(“Stipulation”). This Stipulation is made in accordance with LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR

24

7-1. This is the first request to extend the deadline for the City to file a response to Plaintiffs’

25

Case 3:22-cv-00379-ART-CSD Document 6 Filed 09/14/22 Page 2 of 2

1

Complaint [ECF No. 1], served on August 29, 2022, from September 19, 2022, to October

2

13, 2022.

3

The power to control litigation to which the City is a party ultimately rests with the

4

City’s elected Board of Supervisors (“Board”). See NRS 244.165; see also NRS 0.0305,

5

0.033. City’s counsel does not anticipate having the opportunity to consult with the Board

6

on this matter until the Board’s October 6, 2022, meeting. Therefore, the City has requested,

7

and Plaintiffs have consented to, an extension allowing the City to file its response to

8

Plaintiffs’ Complaint on or before October 13, 2022.

9

THEREFORE, upon agreement of the parties, through their respective counsel, the

10

undersigned respectfully request that this Court grant an extension of time permitting the

11

City to file its response to Plaintiffs’ Complaint [ECF No. 1] on or before October 13, 2022.

12
13
14
15
16
17

DATED this 14th day of September, 2022.
CARSON CITY DISTRICT ATTORNEY

OSHINSKI & FORSBERG, LTD.

By:
/s/ Adam Tully, Esq.
Jason D. Woodbury, Esq.
NV Bar No. 6870
Adam Tully, Esq.
NV Bar No. 13601
Attorneys for Defendant Carson City

By:
/s/ Mark Forsberg, Esq.
Mark Forsberg, Esq.
NV Bar No. 4265
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

18
19
20
21

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED

22

____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

23

DATED:

24
25

-2-

September 14, 2022
________________