Nevada Select Royalty, Inc. v. Jerritt Canyon Gold LLC et al

Filing 104

ORDER granting 103 Stipulation for Extension of Time. Responses re 101 , 102 Motions for Summary Judgment are due on November 25, 2024. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 11/22/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9
10

NEVADA SELECT ROYALTY, INC.,

11
12

Case No.: 3:22-CV-00415-ART-CSD
ORDER GRANTING

Plaintiff,

v.

13

JERRITT CANYON GOLD LLC.,

14

Defendant.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
FILE RESPONSES TO MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(FIRST REQUEST)

15
16

JERRITT CANYON GOLD,
Counter-Claimant,

17

v.

18
19

NEVADA SELECT ROYALTY, INC., and
NOUGHT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

20

Counter-Defendant.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) and Local Rule IA 6-1, Plaintiff
Nevada Select Royalty, Inc., by and through counsel, and Defendant, by and through counsel,
(collectively hereinafter, the “Parties”), hereby stipulate to extend the time for the Parties to
file responses to the pending Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 101 and 102) as
follows. The current deadlines to respond are November 20, 2024 and the requested extension
thereof is for only five additional days. This is the first request for an extension of these
deadlines.

1

1

1. On October 30, 2024, Plaintiff filed its Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.
102).

2
3

2. On October 30, 2024, Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 101).

4
5

3. The responses to the respective Motions for Summary Judgment are due on
November 20, 2024. LR 7-2(b).

6
7

4. The parties hereby stipulate to extend the time for each to file their respective

8

responses to the Motions for Summary Judgment until, up to, and including

9

November 25, 2024.

10

5. Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, this is the first request for an extension of time for the

11

relevant deadlines and the parties submit that good cause supports this request.

12

Plaintiff requested additional time to file its Response to Defendant’s Motion for

13

Summary Judgment due to pressing motions that arose in other cases.

14

Additionally, the parties agreed to extend the deadline for the respective responses

15

to avoid having their respective replies due shortly after the upcoming

16

Thanksgiving holiday. This Stipulation is submitted in good faith and not to cause

17

undue delay in this case.

18
19

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED

November 20, 2024

DATED November 20, 2024

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

HOLLAND & HART LLP

RICE REUTHER SULLIVAN &
CARROLL, LLP

/s/ Joshua M. Halen
Laura K. Granier (NSBN 7357)
Robert C. Ryan (NSBN 7164)
Joshua M. Halen (NSBN 13885)
5470 Kietzke Lane, Suite 100
Reno, NV 89511-2094
Attorneys for Plaintiff

/s/ Anthony J. DiRaimondo
David A. Carroll (NSBN 7643)
Anthony J. DiRaimondo (NSBN 10875)
Robert E. Opdyke (NSBN 12841)
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Ste 1200
Las Vegas, NV 89169
RANDALL DANSKIN, P.S.
Shamus T. O’Doherty
(Pro Hac Vice)

27
28

2

601 W. Riverside Ave, Ste 1500
Spokane, WA 99201

1
2

WELLS ST. JOHN P.S.
Mark Hendricksen (Pro Hac Vice)
601 W. Main Avenue, Ste 600
Spokane, WA 99201

3
4
5

Attorneys for Defendant

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9
10

ANNE R. TRAUM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13

DATED: November 22, 2024
33711496_v2

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3