Buckner v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 64

ORDER (ECF No. 62 ) - The Court sua sponte grants one extension to file a response or opposition to the motion by no later than Tuesday, December 3, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 11/26/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 RORY J. BUCKNER, Case No. 3:22-CV-00479-MMD-CLB 5 6 Plaintiff, v. 7 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, 8 Defendant. ORDER GRANTING SUA SPONTE EXTENSION TO FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE [ECF No. 62] 9 On November 20, 2024, Defendant filed a “Motion Regarding Discovery Dispute,” 10 (ECF No. 62), in compliance with the undersigned Magistrate Judge’s Standing Order. 11 (ECF No. 20.) Pursuant to the Standing Order, Plaintiff was required to file a response 12 “no later than 2 court days after the initial motion” was filed. (Id. at 4.) Therefore, Plaintiff’s 13 response was due by no later than November 25, 2024. However, to date, Plaintiff has 14 failed to file any response or opposition to Defendant’s motion. Therefore, the Court sua 15 sponte grants one extension to file a response or opposition to the motion by no later than 16 Tuesday, December 3, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. Failure to file a response or opposition to the 17 motion by this date may result in the Court granting Defendant’s motion, in its entirety, as 18 unopposed. No further extensions of time will be granted. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 November 26, 2024 DATED: ___________________ 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?