Buckner v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Filing
64
ORDER (ECF No. 62 ) - The Court sua sponte grants one extension to file a response or opposition to the motion by no later than Tuesday, December 3, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 11/26/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
RORY J. BUCKNER,
Case No. 3:22-CV-00479-MMD-CLB
5
6
Plaintiff,
v.
7
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,
8
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING SUA SPONTE
EXTENSION TO FILE A RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION REGARDING
DISCOVERY DISPUTE
[ECF No. 62]
9
On November 20, 2024, Defendant filed a “Motion Regarding Discovery Dispute,”
10
(ECF No. 62), in compliance with the undersigned Magistrate Judge’s Standing Order.
11
(ECF No. 20.) Pursuant to the Standing Order, Plaintiff was required to file a response
12
“no later than 2 court days after the initial motion” was filed. (Id. at 4.) Therefore, Plaintiff’s
13
response was due by no later than November 25, 2024. However, to date, Plaintiff has
14
failed to file any response or opposition to Defendant’s motion. Therefore, the Court sua
15
sponte grants one extension to file a response or opposition to the motion by no later than
16
Tuesday, December 3, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. Failure to file a response or opposition to the
17
motion by this date may result in the Court granting Defendant’s motion, in its entirety, as
18
unopposed. No further extensions of time will be granted.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
November 26, 2024
DATED: ___________________
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?