Scott v. Herzog et al

Filing 49

ORDER RE: SERVICE OF PROCESS : Clerk of Court will issue summonses for Defendant William Miller, and deliver the same, to the U.S. Marshal for service, together with ECF No. 47 address filed under seal; ECF No. 17 Complaint, ECF No. 19 Scree ning order, and this Order. (Emailed to USMS 5/8/2024.) The Court will separately provide to the U.S. Marshal a completed USM-285 form for the Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 5/8/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, III, 5 Case No. 3:22-CV-00564-ART-CLB Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 HERZOG, et al., 8 ORDER RE: SERVICE OF PROCESS Defendants. 9 On May 3, 2024, the Court granted, in part, a motion to make new arrangements 10 of service filed by Plaintiff James Edward Scott. (ECF No. 45.) Specifically, the Court 11 ordered that the Office of the Attorney General (“OAG”) attempt to locate a physical 12 address for Defendant William Miller. (Id.) The OAG has located a physical address for 13 Defendant Miller, which has been filed under seal. (See ECF Nos. 47, 48.) While it is 14 Plaintiff’s obligation to request service of this Defendant, for the purposes of judicial 15 economy, the Court will direct service at this time. 16 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the Clerk shall ISSUE a summons for Defendant 17 William Miller and send the same to the U.S. Marshal with the address provided under 18 seal. (ECF No. 47.) The Clerk shall also SEND sufficient copies of the second amended 19 complaint, (ECF No. 17), the screening order, (ECF No. 19), and this order to the U.S. 20 Marshal for service on the Defendant. The Court will separately provide to the U.S. 21 Marshal a completed USM-285 form for the Defendant. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. May 8, 2024 DATED: ___________________ 24 25 26 27 28 ___________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?