Doe et al v. Washoe County School District et al

Filing 46

ORDER GRANTING 43 Stipulation to Extend Time : Amended Complaint deadline: 12/27/2024. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/7/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

SIGAL CHATTAH, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 8264
CHATTAH LAW GROUP
5875 S. Rainbow Blvd #203
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiffs
JOSEPH S. GILBERT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 9033
JOEY GILBERT LAW
405 Marsh Ave.
Reno, Nevada 89509
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Co-Counsel for Plaintiffs

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
13
14

JANE DOE as Guardian of J. DOE, a
minor, and in her individual capacity,
Plaintiffs,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Case No.: 3:23-cv-00107-ART-CLB

vs.
WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL
DISTRICT, a political subdivision of
the State of Nevada, its BOARD OF
TRUSTEES, and its
SUPERINTENDENT, DR. SUSAN
ENFELD, DOES I-XX and ROE
entities I-XX.

ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION AND ORDER

Defendants.

22
23
24
25

STIPULATION AND ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between SIGAL CHATTAH, ESQ, Counsel for Plaintiffs
JANE DOE as Guardian of J. DOE, a minor, and in her individual capacity, and ANDREA

-1-

1
2
3
4
5

SCHULEWITCH, ESQ. Counsel for Defendants WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, its
BOARD OF TRUSTEES and Dr. SUSAN ENFIELD, the following:
1. On November 14, 2024, this Court entered an Order (ECF No. 42) granting Plaintiff
leave to amend their First Amended Complaint;
2. Whereas pursuant to said Order, Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is due

6

Saturday, December 14, 2024;
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

3. Whereas Counsel for Plaintiff will be out of the Jurisdiction during said period;
4. Whereas there are current discussions on proceeding with the matter in its entirety,
and whether to do so;
5. The Parties agreed to a two-week extension to file said Second Amended Complaint
until December 27, 2024.
6. As this case remains in its early stages, this short extension will not create undue
delay or burden any parties or the Court.
7. The additional time requested herein is not sought for the purposes of delay, but
merely to allow Plaintiff’s Counsel adequate time to explore either disposition or

17

amendment of the Complaint, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
18

8. The Parties confirm that this stipulated first extension is not dilatory in nature.
19
20
21
22

Dated this __13_th day of December, 2024.

_/s/ Andrea Schulewitch_
ANDREA SCHULEWITCH, ESQ.
Counsel for Defendants

/s/ Sigal Chattah ____________
SIGAL CHATTAH, ESQ.
Counsel for Plaintiffs

23
24
25

-2-

1
2
3
4

ORDER
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Parties Stipulations as entered above and the
briefing schedule shall proceed accordingly.
Dated this 7th day of January, 2025.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED

6
7
8

_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

-3-