Doe et al v. Washoe County School District et al

Filing 47

ORDER GRANTING 45 Stipulation to Extend Time: Response/answer to 44 Second Amended Complaint due by 2/10/2025. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/7/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 1/7/2025 to correct year; NEF regenerated (DRM).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

SIGAL CHATTAH, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 8264
CHATTAH LAW GROUP
5875 S. Rainbow Blvd #203
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiffs
JOSEPH S. GILBERT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 9033
JOEY GILBERT LAW
405 Marsh Ave.
Reno, Nevada 89509
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Co-Counsel for Plaintiffs

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12
13
14

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JANE DOE as Guardian of J. DOE, a
minor, and in her individual capacity,
Plaintiffs,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

vs.
WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL
DISTRICT, a political subdivision of
the State of Nevada, its BOARD OF
TRUSTEES, and its
SUPERINTENDENT, DR. SUSAN
ENFELD, DOES I-XX and ROE
entities I-XX.

Case No.: 3:23-cv-00107-MMD-CSD

ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION AND ORDER

Defendants.

22
23
24
25

STIPULATION AND ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between SIGAL CHATTAH, ESQ, Counsel for Plaintiffs
JANE DOE as Guardian of J. DOE, a minor, and in her individual capacity, and ANDREA

-1-

1

SCHULEWITCH, ESQ. Counsel for Defendants WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, its

2

BOARD OF TRUSTEES and Dr. SUSAN ENFIELD, the following:

3

1. On November 14, 2024, this Court entered an Order (ECF No. 42) granting Plaintiff

4

leave to amend his First Amended Complaint;

5

2. Whereas, on December 13, 2024, the parties filed a Stipulation and Order agreeing to

6

extend the deadline for filing the Second Amended Complaint to December 27, 2024

7

(ECF No. 43);

8

3. Whereas Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) was filed on December 27,

9

2024 (ECF No. 44);

10

4. Whereas Defendant’s deadline to respond to the SAC is Friday, January 10, 2025;

11
12

5. Whereas Plaintiffs are in continued discussions on whether they intend to proceed

13

with the matter; the Parties agreed that Plaintiffs will let the Defendants know their

14

intent by January 10, 2025, and the Parties have agreed to a 31-day extension for

15

Defendants to file a response to the SAC until Monday, February 10, 2025, should

16

one be necessary.

17

6. As this case remains in its early stages, this short extension will not create undue

18

delay or burden any parties or the Court.

19

7. The additional time requested herein is not sought for the purposes of delay, but

20

merely to allow the parties to engage in informal discussions to determine how best to

21

proceed in this matter before either party incurs additional attorney’s fees and costs.

22
23

///

24

///

25

///

-2-

1
2

8. The Parties confirm that this stipulated first extension is not dilatory in nature.
Dated this 6th day of January, 2025.

3
4
5

___/s/Andrea Schulewitch___
ANDREA SCHULEWITCH, ESQ.
Counsel for Defendants

6
7
8
9
10
11

__/s/Sigal Chattah_______
SIGAL CHATTAH, ESQ.
Counsel for Plaintiffs
ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Parties Stipulations as entered above and the
briefing schedule shall proceed accordingly.
Dated this 7th day of January, 2025.
IT IS SO ORDERED

12
13

__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

-3-