Hardy v. Bhupinder Singh et al

Filing 63

ORDER Re: 62 Defendant's Motion Regarding Discovery Dispute.Pursuant to the Court's Civil Standing Order (ECF No. 7 ), Plaintiffs shall file a response on or before close of business on Friday, March 7, 2025. The response shall be limited to 5 pages in length. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 3/5/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 6 Case No.: 3:23-cv-00207-ART-CSD DANIEL HARDY, Plaintiff, v. Order Re: ECF No. 62 BHUPINDER SINGH and GRK 7 TRANSPORT LLC, and Does I-X, 8 Defendants. 9 SCOTT THAYER and CINDY THAYER, 10 natural parents and wrongful death heirs of the deceased, COLE THAYER, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 BHUPINDER SINGH and GRK 14 TRANSPORT LLC, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Before the court is Defendant’s Motion Regarding Discovery Dispute. (ECF No. 62.) Pursuant to the Court’s Civil Standing Order (ECF No. 7), Plaintiffs shall file a response on or before close of business on Friday, March 7, 2025. The response shall be limited to 5 pages in length. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 5, 2025. _________________________________ Craig S. Denney United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?