Fritz v. Garrett
Filing
23
ORDER granting ECF No. 22 Motion to Extend Time re ECF 20 Motion. Replies due by 6/11/2024. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 6/5/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - GA)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
GREGORY A. FRITZ,
Case No. 3:23-cv-00241-ART-CLB
5
Petitioner,
6
7
ORDER
v.
NETHANJAH BREITENBACH, et al.,
8
Respondents.
9
10
In this habeas corpus action, Petitioner Gregroy A. Fritz, represented by
11
appointed counsel, filed an amended habeas petition on May 13, 2024. (ECF No.
12
19.) On that same date, along with the amended petition, Fritz also filed a motion
13
for leave to file a second amended petition. (ECF No. 20.) Respondents filed an
14
opposition to that motion on May 23, 2024. (ECF No. 21.) Fritz was then due to
15
file a reply in support of the motion by May 30, 2024. See LR 7-2(b).
16
On May 30, 2024, Fritz filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 22),
17
requesting an extension of 12 days, to June 11, 2024. Fritz’s counsel explains
18
that the extension of time is necessary because of the time required to draft the
19
proposed second amended petition and because of obligations in other cases.
20
Fritz’s counsel represents that Respondents do not oppose the motion for
21
extension of time.
22
The Court finds that the motion for extension of time is made in good faith
23
and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the
24
requested extension of time.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
It is therefore ordered that Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time (ECF
2
No. 22) is granted. Petitioner will have until and including June 11, 2024, to file
3
a reply in support of the motion for leave to file a second amended habeas
4
petition.
5
6
7
DATED THIS 5th day of June 2024.
8
9
10
ANNE R. TRAUM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?