Scott v. Taitano et al
Filing
27
ORDER granting 26 Motion to Identify Unserved Defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 21 days of the date of entry of this order (5/31/2024), the Attorney General's Office shall file notice advising the Court and Plaintiff of whether it can or cannot accept service on behalf of Defendant Michael Ortzel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 5/10/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, III,
5
Case No. 3:23-CV-00263-ART-CLB
6
v.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
IDENTIFY TRUE NAME OF DEFENDANT
MICHAEL ORTZEL
7
TAITANO, et al.,
[ECF No. 26]
Plaintiff,
8
Defendants.
9
On March 25, 2024, Defendants filed their notice of acceptance of service and
10
stated that the Office of the Attorney General (“OAG”) could not accept service for “Ortzel”
11
as the true identity of the Defendant was not known at that time. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff
12
James Edward Scott filed two separate motions requesting that the OAG take additional
13
steps to identify the unserved defendant. (ECF Nos. 18, 20.) The Court denied the
14
motions and directed Plaintiff to file a motion identifying a specific name for the defendant.
15
(ECF Nos. 19, 22.)
16
Plaintiff has now filed a motion identifying the unserved defendant and has
17
provided more specific information as to Defendant Ortzel, who he names as “Michael
18
Ortzel”. (ECF No. 26.) Thus, Plaintiff has provided additional information in compliance
19
with this Court’s prior orders.
20
21
Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to identify unserved defendant,
(ECF No. 26), is GRANTED.
22
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 21 days of the date of entry of this order,
23
the Attorney General’s Office shall file notice advising the Court and Plaintiff of whether it
24
can or cannot accept service on behalf of Defendant Michael Ortzel. If the Attorney
25
General’s Office cannot accept service on behalf of Michael Ortzel, the Office shall file,
26
under seal, but shall not serve on Plaintiff, the last known address of Michael Ortzel, if it
27
has such information. If the last known address of Michael Ortzel is a post office box, the
28
Attorney General's Office shall attempt to obtain and provide the last known physical
1
address. If service cannot be accepted for Michael Ortzel, Plaintiff shall file a motion
2
requesting issuance of a summons, specifying a full name and address for Michael
3
Ortzel. If the Attorney General has not provided last-known-address information, Plaintiff
4
shall provide the full name and address for Michael Ortzel.
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 10, 2024
DATED: ________________
___________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?