Glover v. Nevada Department of Corrections

Filing 20

ORDER RE: STATUS REPORT REGARDING SETTLEMENT - IT IS ORDERED that NDOC's counsel will have until February 3, 2025, to either (1) file a stipulation and proposed order for dismissal or (2) file an updated status report explicitly detailing w hat terms of the settlement have been completed, which terms have not been completed with and expressly explaining the reason for the delay, and a specific explanation as to when any outstanding terms of the settlement will be completed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 1/28/2025. (For Distribution by law library.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 DAYQUON GLOVER, Case No. 3:23-CV-00374-MMD-CLB 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: STATUS REPORT REGARDING SETTLEMENT NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., [ECF No. 19] Defendants. Before the Court is Interested Party Nevada Department of Corrections’ (“NDOC”) status report regarding settlement. (ECF No. 19.) The parties reached a settlement at the Inmate Early Mediation Conference held on December 10, 2024, and the parties were ordered to file a stipulation and proposed order of dismissal with the Court by no later than January 24, 2025. (ECF No. 17.) NDOC’s status report states that as of January 24, 2025, NDOC’s counsel had “not received positive confirmation that the conditions of the settlement [had] been complied with.” (ECF No. 19.) Thus, NDOC requests an additional 14 days to file a stipulation and order for dismissal. (Id.) NDOC’s counsel’s representation that he was unable to confirm with his own client whether the terms of the settlement were complied with. The Court finds to be entirely unacceptable. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that NDOC’s counsel will have until February 3, 2025, to either (1) file a stipulation and proposed order for dismissal or (2) file an updated status report explicitly detailing what terms of the settlement have been completed, which terms have not been completed with and expressly explaining the reason for the delay, and a specific explanation as to when any outstanding terms of the settlement will be completed. Failure to provide this specificity in any status report may result in sanctions. DATED: January 28, 2025 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?