Kerr et al v. Northern Nevada Family Dental et al

Filing 59

ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that discovery in this case is STAYED until the final motion to dismiss in this case is resolved. In the event any of the motions to dismiss are denied, the parties are ordered to file a propos ed discovery plan and scheduling order within 21 days of the issuance of the order resolving the final pending motion to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 11/14/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 TERRY KERR and DENNIS KERR, 5 Plaintiffs, 6 7 Case No. 3:23-CV-00418-ART-CLB ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY v. 8 NORTHERN NEVADA FAMILY DENTAL, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 On November 13, 2023, Defendants filed a Case Management Report. (ECF No. 11 58.) Defendants explain they made multiple attempts to reach Plaintiffs at the phone 12 number listed on their filings, but neither Plaintiff responded to Defendants’ voicemails. 13 (Id. at 2.) Currently, multiple motions to dismiss are pending that indicate the Court may 14 lack jurisdiction in this case. (See ECF Nos. 12, 17, 21, 31, 35.) Consequently, 15 Defendants request for discovery to be stayed pending a ruling on the motions to dismiss. 16 (ECF No. 58 at 4-5.) Alternatively, Defendants request “[a]n extended discovery period is 17 warranted in light of the numerous pending motions and the repetitive, undiscernible 18 nature and largely time-barred claims asserted by the pro se Plaintiffs, many of which are 19 likely to be disposed of in whole or in part through the pending motions.” (Id. at 5.) Here, 20 the Court finds that a stay of discovery is warranted due to Plaintiff’s failure to respond as 21 it relates to the Case Management Report and discovery obligations combined with the 22 multiple motions to dismiss that allege this Court lacks jurisdiction in this case. 23 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that discovery in this case is STAYED until the 24 final motion to dismiss in this case is resolved. In the event any of the motions to dismiss 25 are denied, the parties are ordered to file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order 26 within 21 days of the issuance of the order resolving the final pending motion to dismiss. 27 /// 28 1 2 The updated discovery plan shall include updated dates for all applicable discovery deadlines, including the deadlines for disclosing expert witnesses. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 November 14, 2023 DATED: ___________________. 5 6 __________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?