Borden v. Bau et al

Filing 35

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for relief, ECF No. 34 , is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no further documents are to be filed in this closed case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall return as unfiled any further documents received in this closed case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 5/7/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - GA)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 6 7 Case No. 3:23-CV-00449-CLB RICHARD BORDIN, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR RELIEF Plaintiffs, v. [ECF No. 34] JON RAU, et. al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 11 On May 7, 2024, Plaintiff Richard Bordin filed a “Motion for Relief” with the Court, 12 (ECF No. 34). While not entirely clear, this filing appears to be a letter or 13 correspondence with the Court. However, on April 10, 2024, the Court granted 14 Defendants Jon Rau and Josh Rau’s motion to dismiss and entered judgment in favor of 15 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 31, 32.) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for relief, (ECF No. 34), is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no further documents are to be filed in this closed case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall return as unfiled any further documents received in this closed case. IT IS SO ORDERED. May 7, 2024 DATE: _________________. ______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?