Davis v. Pickens
Filing
49
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Davis's motion for leave to amend his complaint, (ECF No. 48 ), is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. However, pursuant to the Court's Scheduling Order, (ECF No. 43 ), Davis is permitted to re-file a properl y supported motion for leave to file an amended complaint, which must include points and authorities that support amending his complaint, for the Court's consideration by no later than Monday, January 13, 2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 1/2/2025. (For Distribution by law library.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - GA)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
TERRANCE DAVIS,
Case No. 3:24-CV-00119-ART-CLB
5
6
7
Plaintiff,
v.
[ECF No. 48]
MADELINE PICKENS, et. al.,
8
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO AMEND COMPLAINT
Defendants.
9
10
Before the Court is Plaintiff Terrance Davis’s (“Davis”) motion for leave to file an
11
amended complaint. (ECF No. 48.) In the motion, Davis seeks to amend his complaint to
12
add defendants Warden Patricia Hernandez and Warden Tesheena Cooke. (Id. at 2.)
13
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(a), all motions “must be supported by a memorandum
14
of points and authorities.” “The failure of a moving party to file points and authorities in
15
support of the motion constitutes a consent to the denial of the motion.” L.R. 7-2(d). Here,
16
Davis has not provided points and authorities that explain why additional defendants
17
should be joined under the corresponding rules of Civil Procedure and what facts support
18
their addition to the case. Therefore, Davis’s motion for leave to amend his complaint,
19
(ECF No. 48), is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. However, pursuant to the Court’s
20
Scheduling Order, (ECF No. 43), Davis is permitted to re-file a properly supported motion
21
for leave to file an amended complaint, which must include points and authorities that
22
support amending his complaint, for the Court’s consideration by no later than Monday,
23
January 13, 2025.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
January 2, 2025
DATED: ______________.
26
27
28
__________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?