Dick v. O'Malley

Filing 13

ORDER - The Court will sua sponte grant Dick an extension to December 30, 2024, to file his motion for reversal/remand. Absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extensions of time will be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 11/26/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 ALVIN E. DICK, Case No. 3:24-CV-00328-CLB 5 Plaintiff 6 v. 7 MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, 8 ORDER GRANTING SUA SPONTE EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REMAND/REVERSAL Defendant. 9 10 On July 25, 2024, Plaintiff Alvin E. Dick (“Dick”) initiated this action, which involves 11 judicial review of an administrative action by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, 12 denying his claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1.) 13 On August 15, 2024, this Court issued an order concerning review of social 14 security cases, (ECF No. 10). The order explicitly required Dick to file any motion for 15 remand or reversal within 60 days of the filing of the certified administrative record. (Id. at 16 2.) On September 25, 2024, Defendant Commissioner Martin O’Malley (“Commissioner”) 17 filed the certified administrative record. (ECF No. 12.) Thus, pursuant to this Court’s order, 18 Dick had until Monday, November 25, 2024, to file his motion for remand or reversal, but 19 to date has failed to do so. 20 For good cause appearing, the Court will sua sponte grant Dick an extension to 21 December 30, 2024, to file his motion for reversal/remand. Absent extraordinary 22 circumstances, no further extensions of time will be granted. If Dick fails to timely file his 23 motion for reversal/remand, the Court will consider appropriate sanctions, up to and 24 including dismissal of this action without prejudice. 25 November 26, 2024 DATED: __________________ 26 27 28 ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?