Bachmann v. Whalen et al

Filing 25

ORDER granting 23 Stipulation to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8 ); and Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 3/10/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 SAGEBRUSH LAW GROUP, PLLC Astrid A. Perez, Esq. (NSB 15977) PO Box 13744 Reno, NV 89507 Phone 775) 252-9639| Fax 775) 258-0624 aperez@sagebrushlawgroup.com 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 DISTRICT OF NEVADA PAMELA BACHMANN, an individual, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00382-CSD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND STAY TRANSPORTATION, a public entity; JAMES DISCOVERY vs. WHALEN, an individual: DOES I through X. inclusive; and ROE COOPERATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendant. Plaintiff PAMELA BACHMANN (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), by and through her counsel of 17 record Astrid A. Perez, Esq of Sagebrush Law Group, PLLC, and Defendants STATE OF 18 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and JAMES WHALEN, (collectively, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 “Defendants”), by and through its counsel of record AARON D. FORD, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, DANIEL R. HANSEN, Esq. Deputy Attorney General. of the Office of the Attorney General, hereby stipulate and submit to the Court for consideration the following STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO DISMISS AND STAY DISCOVERY. On Thursday, March 6, 2025, the parties attended and participated in good faith the Early Neutral Evaluation. The parties were unable to reach a resolution, but have agreed to participate in a continued ENE, scheduled for April 10, 2025, at 9 a.m. In consideration of the continued ENE, the parties have agreed to withdraw the Motion to Dismiss pending before the Court and maintain STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO DISMISS AND STAY DISCOVERY - 1 1 the stay of discovery. The parties agree that if the matter is not resolved at the continued ENE, the 2 parties will refile the withdrawn Motion to Dismiss [ECF 8], Opposition to Motion to Dismiss 3 4 5 [ECF 10 ], and Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss [ECF 11]. The Motion to Dismiss will be filed within 7 days of the continued ENE. The Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss will be filed 6 within 4 days of the refiled Motion to Dismiss. The Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss will 7 be filed within 4 days of the days of the refiled Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. All refiled 8 documents will be identical to the originally filed documents. 9 10 11 The stay of discovery will remain in effect until said decision has been made on the renewed Motion to Dismiss. 12 13 Dated this 10th day of March, 2025 Dated this 7th day of March, 2025 14 /s/ Astrid A. Perez Astrid A. Perez, Esq. (NSB 15977) SAGEBRUSH LAW GROUP, PLLC PO Box 13744 Reno, NV 89507 Phone 775) 252-9639| Fax 775) 258-0624 aperez@sagebrushlawgroup.com /s/ Daniel R. Hansen DANIEL R. HANSEN Nevada Bar No. 14536 Deputy Attorney General Attorney for Defendants, State of NevadaDepartment of Transportation, James Whalen, an individual. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated this 10th ___ of ____________________, 2025. March 24 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO DISMISS AND STAY DISCOVERY - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?