Cruz v. Royal et al
Filing
3
ORDER - It is therefore ordered that Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without having to prepay the full filing fee (ECF No. 1 ) is denied. Petitioner has 30 days from the date this order is entered no lat er than February 5, 2025 in which to have the $5.00 filing fee sent to the Clerk of Court. Failure to pay the filing fee within 30 days may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further prior notice. The Clerk of Court is directed to retain the petition but not file it at this time. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/6/2025. (For Distribution by law library.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - GA)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
***
FRANCISCO ANTONIO CRUZ,
7
8
9
Case No. 3:24-cv-00552-MMD-CLB
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
TERRY ROYAL, et al.,
10
11
Respondents.
12
Francisco Antonio Cruz has submitted a pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ
13
of habeas corpus and an application to proceed in forma pauperis to this Court. (ECF
14
Nos. 1, 1-1.) Based on the current information about Petitioner’s financial status, including
15
any additional information he may have provided, the Court finds that he is able to pay
16
the full fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
17
It is therefore ordered that Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma
18
pauperis without having to prepay the full filing fee (ECF No. 1) is denied. Petitioner has
19
30 days from the date this order is entered—no later than February 5, 2025—in which to
20
have the $5.00 filing fee sent to the Clerk of Court. Failure to pay the filing fee within 30
21
days may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further prior
22
notice. The Clerk of Court is directed to retain the petition but not file it at this time.
23
DATED THIS 6th Day of January 2025.
24
25
26
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?