Dahar v. Jackson et al

Filing 5

ORDER temporarily granting 4 Motion to Stay. So Ordered by Judge Joseph A. DiClerico Jr. (dae, ) Modified on 6/2/2005 to add temporarily (dae, ).

Dahar v. Jackson et al Doc. 5 Case 1:05-cv-00186-JD Document 5 Filed 06/01/2005 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Victor Dahar, Trustee v. Susan W. Jackson ORDER The bankrupcy court entered judgment against Susan W. Jackson and in favor of the bankruptcy trustee, Victor Dahar, in the amount of $260,130.67 in December of 2004. Following Civil No. 05-cv-186-JD resolution of her motion to alter or amend judgment, Jackson filed a notice of appeal in the bankruptcy court. On May 20, 2005, the bankruptcy court denied her motion for a stay of the judgment pending appeal but granted a stay to give her time to seek a stay in this court while her appeal is pending. The stay granted by the bankruptcy court will expire at 5:00 p.m. today. On May 31, 2005, Susan W. Jackson filed a notice of appeal in this court, and today she filed a motion for a stay pending appeal. Victor Dahar, the bankruptcy trustee, has not had an The court will grant a temporary stay of opportunity to respond. the judgment to provide Dahar an opportunity to respond to Jackson's motion. The judgment against Jackson entered in the bankruptcy court is stayed until this court resolves her motion for a stay pending appeal. Jackson shall file copies of the Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:05-cv-00186-JD Document 5 Filed 06/01/2005 Page 2 of 2 bankruptcy court's orders entering judgment against her and denying her motion to alter and amend judgment on or before June 6, 2005. Dahar shall file a response to Jackson's motion for a stay pending appeal on or before June 15, 2005. SO ORDERED. Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. United States District Judge June 1, 2005 cc: Thomas J. Pappas, Esquire John R. Michels, Esquire Richard Thorner, Esquire USBC-NH, Clerk 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?